11-10-2004, 03:46 AM | #1 |
Carmudgeon
Join Date: Jul 2004
Carmudgeonly Ride: Invalid Carriage
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,932
|
C&D Review: Mustang GT
With 5 out of the last 10 (and counting!) active Car Talk threads having something to do with the new Mustang, I though I'd do my part.
To sum up, overall they loved it. There were complaints, of course, and some of them echoed observations made by clyde and JST during their test drive. However, they seemed impressed that Ford made such a quantum leap forward without jacking up the price a few thousand. Select excerpts (because it's not on their site yet, I'll type them out): "Throttle tip-in is more gentle and predictable. There's still some minor clutch slipping required for first-gear starts, but you can now floor the throttle at 5 mph, than suddenly jump out of it completely without inducing transmission windup." "Speaking of gushing forth, let's move on to thrust. Three easy steps here: (1) Disable the traction control - a large button up high on the dash, just as Don Garlits intended. (2) Zing the revs to four grand. (3) Dump the clutch. The Mustang squats an inch, than launches straight, hard, and true, painting five to ten feet of expensive P Zero Nero stripes, depending on road texture. In a flash, the V-8 bangs off the rev limiter, and the tires bark on the upshift to second like deep-chested Newfoundlands. Beautiful, man - smoke, noise, velocity, enraged neighbors. Unalloyed essence of Mustang." "Sixty mph is yours in 5.2 seconds... One hundred looms large in 13.2 seconds... And the quarter-mile is history in 13.8 seconds at 102 mph. Which means the only other pony-car poseur on the market - the costlier, slower-selling 350-horse Pontiac GTO - will be humbled at the drag strip by your lowly little Ford coupe." (Ouch! ) "The improved shift linkage and stubby new shifter... are co-conspirators in the accel figures. Throws are shorter, less notchy, and require less thought. And even the clutch effort is reduced." "The next best thing about the Mustang is that it now rides like a modern car... Yet even with the cushier ride, handling has improved. Not even the most recent independent-rear-suspension SVT Cobra can match the new GT's skidpad grip, which now also surpasses a Nissan 350Z Touring's, come to think of it." "Neutral, understeer, oversteer. Quite a smorgasbord. And the tail-happiness now materializes more gently, rather than in one heart-stopping twitch. Throughout, extraneous body movements are nicely damped." "Fact is, there's a precision to this Mustang's movement that makes the old car feel like Mr. Ed. Did we just say 'precision' and 'Mustang' in the same sentence?" ( ) "The rack-and-pinion steering still isn't a paradigm of accuracy or feel. Road textures, in particular, are transmitted only vaguely. But at least the effort is light at all speeds, the power assist never feels artificial, and there's no kickback." "Pedal modulation is merely ho-hum, what you'd expect. from say, a Taurus. The transition from threshold braking to ABS is abrupt and tricky to predict..." "Freeway tracking is exemplary. Gear whine is down to tolerable levels. And this platform is as flex-free as your average Montana bridge abutment. This is the first Mustang whose subassemblies and trim aren't allied in a confederacy of gronks, clinks, and shivers." "Nevertheless, the GT exhibits a blend of compliance and response worthy of a BMW." ( aranoid: ) "Unlike the old Stang, this one slips on comfortably - the three-spoke wheel, the pedals, and the stunted shifter all in ergonomic harmony." (Some test results and vital stats) Street start, 5-60: 5.9 Top speed (governed) 149 Roadholding: 0.87 3523 lbs Weight distribution: 53.6/46.4 11.7 lbs per hp Base price: $24,995 THE VERDICT Highs: Vastly improved ride, slicker shifter, more power, same old friendly price. Lows: Ho-hum steering and brakes, needlessly dour interior. The Verdict: The best Mustang since April 17th, 1964. Side note: Regarding the other thread concerning Plaz and his choice of black doughnuts, I'm happy to see C&D all but officially endorsing the Pilot Sport PS2's in this issue, alternatively describing them as "griptastic" and "today's must-have" in separate articles by different editors. |
11-10-2004, 07:07 AM | #2 |
Realist
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 124
|
I actually didn't expect them to gush about it but I never know what to expect with C&D.
That's a pretty glowing review. I personally will have to drive one to believe that the solid rear axle is worthwhile but this is the third of fourth source that has said it is tight, agile and didn't have any problems as a result. I will have to test drive one at the end of next month when I am in the market to buy.
__________________
2004 Mazda6s V6 5 speed manual |
11-10-2004, 07:10 AM | #3 | ||
•••••••
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: '11 1M
Location: Churzee
Posts: 17,741
|
Re: C&D Review: Mustang GT
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
2011 1M |
||
11-10-2004, 08:32 AM | #4 |
195
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,609
|
This will both date me and further reveal my Mustang predilection, but that C/D review was the best review of a Mustang they've done since the 1985/6 Mustang GT (can't remember which one). There, too, they gushed about the unexpected good chassis dynamics in the recently revised Mustang; though the change from 1984 to 1985 was not as substantial as the 2004-->2005 change, it did involve (IIRC) the addition of the Quadra-Shock rear and a bump in hp from the Holley carbuereted engine to over 200 (205?). They said the car had a Germanic way of getting down the road. Back then, the Mustang GT's calling card was value, though 20 years ago that meant less than 10K for a GT.
The more things change... |
11-10-2004, 08:34 AM | #5 |
Crotchety
Join Date: Nov 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: 2016 BMW M3
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,376
|
Hmmm...good article and interesting info. Thanks for the post.
|
11-10-2004, 09:51 AM | #6 | ||
Chief title editor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 26,599
|
Quote:
Quote:
|
||
11-10-2004, 10:40 AM | #7 | |||
195
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,609
|
Quote:
I think it was a carburetor in that car; I remember a pic of the round air cleaner. I also vaguely recall the price being listed as 9995, or something similar, but that was probably before destination or any options. I found a brief reference to a review in C/D in Jan. 1985--that jibes with my memory, as I recall that issue being a Ten Best issue. http://www.mustangregistry.org/lx_85_86.htm I forgot about the upgraded rear. When did the 4 speed manual switch to 5? Was that 85, as well, or was that earlier? |
|||
11-10-2004, 11:14 AM | #8 | |
Chief title editor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 26,599
|
Quote:
They had 5 speeds at least as far back as 1983 (although I'm not sure if they were for the V8s or the 4cyl Turbo GTs only). |
|
11-10-2004, 11:25 AM | #9 |
Chief title editor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 26,599
|
Not what we're looking for, but fun nonetheless.
http://www.iroc-zpostforum.com/NewsTitleBout2.htm http://www.iroc-zpostforum.com/NewsBestGT.htm
__________________
OH NOES!!!!!1 MY CAR HAS T3H UND3R5T33R5555!!!!!!1oneone!!!!11 Team WTF?! What are you gonna do? |
11-10-2004, 11:42 AM | #10 | |
195
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,609
|
Quote:
I remember the "thickness of a license plate" line. Imagining how agricultural an 87 GT would feel today makes some of their descriptions unintentionally hilarious. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|