carmudgeons.com  

Go Back   carmudgeons.com > Automotive Forums > Car Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-10-2023, 06:29 PM   #51
jpgurl
Carmudgeon
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: '22 MACH-E; '74 Austin Mini
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,754
Quote:
Originally Posted by robg View Post
Sounds like you’re still eligible:
excellent!
jpgurl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2023, 11:10 PM   #52
Terri Kennedy
There and back again
 
Terri Kennedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: 2003 BMW 325xiT; looking for a new fun car
Location: New York
Posts: 2,939
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZBB View Post
The main panel was already full, and a sub-panel had been installed next to it that only had a couple open slots. I was worried about overloading the house and never called an electrician for an estimate...
15+ years or ago, I decided I needed to get rid of the ticking time bombs that were my Federal Pacific breaker panels. I got quotes from a number of electricians and all were insanely high based on my known costs for the materials and the estimated labor hours. Finally I said the heck with it and decided to do it myself. Upgraded the service from dual 100A to dual 200A with a 100A sub-panel:





As you can see from the paint outlines in the second picture, the Flaming Pacific panels were not the original ones on the house - I think the original service was with an A-base meter. The FP panels were on the backboard extension with the yellow paint. The oldest wiring in the house (with a single horizontal outlet per room) goes to a 2-circuit fuse box on each floor, with both the hot and neutral fused. More modern wiring went to the FP panels with no intervening fusing. Which, given FP's history, probably was a bad idea.

I got the new panels mounted on a new backboard and the conduit cut, bent and threaded in advance. Then, under the cover of darkness on 2 consecutive nights the 1st floor and then the 2nd floor were moved over to the new panels.

The second picture with the digital meters was taken a few years later - those are fancy ones that change the display to "TAMPER" if you pull the meter from the base. When I did the swap-out I still had the spinning-disc mechanical meters so nobody noticed anything.

I posted these pics quite a few years ago on a wiring forum and got told they were "electrician porn".

Edited to add: For those not "in the know", the 2 larger panels are Square D QO series 40-position panels. The one in the middle is their smaller 100A main lug cousin. Square D is probably the best residential / light commercial panel you can get. Which is odd, because their parent company Schneider also owns Federal Pacific (Federal Pioneer in Canada).

Last edited by Terri Kennedy; 01-11-2023 at 11:23 PM. Reason: Add more info on panels
Terri Kennedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-11-2023, 11:53 PM   #53
lemming
Western Anomaly
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terri Kennedy View Post
15+ years or ago, I decided I needed to get rid of the ticking time bombs that were my Federal Pacific breaker panels. I got quotes from a number of electricians and all were insanely high based on my known costs for the materials and the estimated labor hours. Finally I said the heck with it and decided to do it myself. Upgraded the service from dual 100A to dual 200A with a 100A sub-panel:





As you can see from the paint outlines in the second picture, the Flaming Pacific panels were not the original ones on the house - I think the original service was with an A-base meter. The FP panels were on the backboard extension with the yellow paint. The oldest wiring in the house (with a single horizontal outlet per room) goes to a 2-circuit fuse box on each floor, with both the hot and neutral fused. More modern wiring went to the FP panels with no intervening fusing. Which, given FP's history, probably was a bad idea.

I got the new panels mounted on a new backboard and the conduit cut, bent and threaded in advance. Then, under the cover of darkness on 2 consecutive nights the 1st floor and then the 2nd floor were moved over to the new panels.

The second picture with the digital meters was taken a few years later - those are fancy ones that change the display to "TAMPER" if you pull the meter from the base. When I did the swap-out I still had the spinning-disc mechanical meters so nobody noticed anything.

I posted these pics quite a few years ago on a wiring forum and got told they were "electrician porn".

Edited to add: For those not "in the know", the 2 larger panels are Square D QO series 40-position panels. The one in the middle is their smaller 100A main lug cousin. Square D is probably the best residential / light commercial panel you can get. Which is odd, because their parent company Schneider also owns Federal Pacific (Federal Pioneer in Canada).
What are the three small devices that look like voltmeters that are positioned under the box labeled “common areas”?

Can’t tell what their output is saying.
__________________


lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2023, 12:42 AM   #54
Terri Kennedy
There and back again
 
Terri Kennedy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: 2003 BMW 325xiT; looking for a new fun car
Location: New York
Posts: 2,939
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemming View Post
What are the three small devices that look like voltmeters that are positioned under the box labeled “common areas”?

Can’t tell what their output is saying.
They're displays for current transformers on the feeder leads for the 3 panels. They display electric consumption in KWh and projected cost. They were less useful than I had hoped, for a number of reasons:

1) They are designed for 120/240V, while my power is 120/208V (I'm on a 3-phase block).

2) There is no way to program them with the consumption-based rate that my utility uses (a series of steps that decrease the rate per KWh as you use more power, but then increase as you continue to use more power).

3) There was no way to synchronize their sample cycle with the somewhat-random billing cycle.

I added them because I got a 7MWh bill one month - the spinning-disc meters didn't have remote reading capabilities and they kept using estimated readings. I would have paid it as I used that much power, but the utility tried a bunch of sneaky tricks - they waited until after a big rate increase and then billed it as if it all happened in the month after the increase. Remember what I said about the sliding-scale rate climbing after some usage amount?

I didn't get anywhere with the utility, so I went to the Public Utility Commission and filed a complaint in person. They negotiated with the utility to allocate the usage evenly across the 26 months or so of estimated readings, so it avoided the rate increase and the ever-increasing charge per KWh in each cycle. The utility called me up and said "Would you like this spread out evenly over the next 26 billing cycles at 0% interest?" and I said no, I'd pay it all up-front - I just objected to the way they were trying to maximize their profit by trying to bill it all after a rate increase as if it was all used that month.

That was part of an ongoing series of metering issues. I'd had one or both meters pulled by the utility at various times because I complained that they were reading high. I'd get a form letter each time saying "Our meter shop has examined your meter #12345 and found it to be performing properly." But a billing cycle or 2 later, there would be a credit on my bill for anywhere from $800 to $3000 to correct "reading anomalies".

Part of the problem was their use of 120/240V mechanical meters for a 120/208V service. There are inaccuracies introduced due to the phase angle difference between the 2 hot legs on those 2 types of service. Once they switched to the digital meters (with remote reading) all those problems went away. So those monitoring devices are just sitting there displaying meaningless numbers. The only reason I didn't take them down is they have solid current transformers on the feeders instead of split ones, so I'd need to disconnect the feeders to get them off.
Terri Kennedy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2023, 07:39 AM   #55
John V
No more BMWs
 
John V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,753
What's with all the FMC? Code requirement in your area?
John V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2023, 10:27 AM   #56
Nick M3
Relic
 
Nick M3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 12,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V View Post
What's with all the FMC? Code requirement in your area?
Less effort than hard conduit, presumably.

Edit: And Romex is not supposed to be exposed.
__________________
2011 M3
2006 Sierra 2500HD 4WD LBZ/Allison
2004 X5 3.0i 6MT
1995 M3 S50B32
1990 325is
1989 M3 S54B32

Hers:
1989 325iX
1996 911 Turbo


Nick M3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2023, 11:46 AM   #57
Alan
Carmudgeon
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,668
Quote:
Originally Posted by Terri Kennedy View Post
15+ years or ago, I decided I needed to get rid of the ticking time bombs that were my Federal Pacific breaker panels. I got quotes from a number of electricians and all were insanely high based on my known costs for the materials and the estimated labor hours. Finally I said the heck with it and decided to do it myself. Upgraded the service from dual 100A to dual 200A with a 100A sub-panel
Is this for a 1 family home or is it a Multiple family home ?

500 amp total is tremendous
Alan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2023, 01:52 PM   #58
lip277
The old cranky SOB....
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: several cars... way too many....
Location: Near Seattle
Posts: 4,798
I agree - the pics Terri has above are great.
I have 200A service in each of the house and shop. The house takes its feed from the transformer on the street. The shop is back far enough from the road that it (evidently) needs its own transformer about 2/3's of the way down my driveway. VERY nice to have that kind of power available - at least in the shop. I have really used that capability with the shop remodel.
__________________
Kevin


1970 2800CS - - 2001 740iL - - 2006 997.1 - - 2012 Escalade
1968 Mustang GT Convertible - - 2003 Ford F250 PSD - - 1985 728i
lip277 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2023, 02:30 PM   #59
Nick M3
Relic
 
Nick M3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 12,458
Quote:
Originally Posted by Alan View Post
Is this for a 1 family home or is it a Multiple family home ?

500 amp total is tremendous
I mean, the sub-panel comes out of the 400 total. It's dual 200 service.

Nominally, we have 400A service at Doom, but they only installed a CL200 meter.
__________________
2011 M3
2006 Sierra 2500HD 4WD LBZ/Allison
2004 X5 3.0i 6MT
1995 M3 S50B32
1990 325is
1989 M3 S54B32

Hers:
1989 325iX
1996 911 Turbo


Nick M3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-12-2023, 03:32 PM   #60
John V
No more BMWs
 
John V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick M3 View Post
Less effort than hard conduit, presumably.

Edit: And Romex is not supposed to be exposed.
For residential around here at least, I've never seen anything other than Romex coming out of the panel, other than in pole barn type buildings where there are no finished walls, in which case metallic hard conduit is used. Just wondering if it's a code thing for her area. It's much easier to do Romex in a tidy fashion than it is with FMC
John V is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:00 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums © 2003-2008, 'Mudgeon Enterprises - Site hosting by AYN & Associates, LLC