carmudgeons.com  

Go Back   carmudgeons.com > Automotive Forums > Car Talk > Perseverators Anonymous

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-14-2022, 12:38 PM   #2431
Nick M3
Relic
 
Nick M3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 12,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by JST View Post
No, but that's part of the reason that the .2 non-Turbos command such a premium, because it feels like they don't have the same issues that afflict the .1s or the Turbos.

That said, I haven't really paid attention to which cars are impacted by bore scoring. Not sure if that hits the .2s, as well?
Yeah... A friend of mine just bailed on a 997.1 C2S due to bore scoring that turned up in PPI. I'd been generally kind of negative on that car (kind of high mileage for a non-DIYer), but that was too much.
__________________
2011 M3
2006 Sierra 2500HD 4WD LBZ/Allison
2004 X5 3.0i 6MT
1995 M3 S50B32
1990 325is
1989 M3 S54B32

Hers:
1989 325iX
1996 911 Turbo


Nick M3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2022, 01:23 PM   #2432
SCA
Jaded
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,097
Ouch… that stinks for the current owner, but certainly a blessing for your friend. Did they even make it as far to get the over rev report? Just curious.

My car has higher miles than I would like, but it is considered to be low by the national average or even the regional average (12K). It is somewhat satisfying to realize that it was never really a garage queen as it was driven frequently while also being properly maintained via its former multiple Porsche owner/enthusiast.
SCA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2022, 01:28 PM   #2433
Nick M3
Relic
 
Nick M3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 12,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCA View Post
Ouch… that stinks for the current owner, but certainly a blessing for your friend. Did they even make it as far to get the over rev report? Just curious.

My car has higher miles than I would like, but it is considered to be low by the national average or even the regional average (12K). It is somewhat satisfying to realize that it was never really a garage queen as it was driven frequently while also being properly maintained via its former multiple Porsche owner/enthusiast.
IIRC, the overrev report was pretty clean. He made it far enough to spring fro borescoping the cylinders, so pretty far. That was the last item.
__________________
2011 M3
2006 Sierra 2500HD 4WD LBZ/Allison
2004 X5 3.0i 6MT
1995 M3 S50B32
1990 325is
1989 M3 S54B32

Hers:
1989 325iX
1996 911 Turbo


Nick M3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2022, 01:36 PM   #2434
JST
195
 
JST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,632
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick M3 View Post
Yeah... A friend of mine just bailed on a 997.1 C2S due to bore scoring that turned up in PPI. I'd been generally kind of negative on that car (kind of high mileage for a non-DIYer), but that was too much.
That sucks. I find the bore scoring and IMS issues annoying partly because so much of the intel on them comes from Jake Raby, whom...well, it's not that I don't trust him, exactly, but he's definitely found a market niche and I think his incentives are not entirely aligned with mine, as an owner.
JST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2022, 01:38 PM   #2435
lemming
Western Anomaly
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,644
Also seems like anecdotal camshaft issues on 997.1 Turbo motors.

Maybe it does not afflict the 997.2 Turbo’s.

Similarly, the DFI 997.2 engines seem less problematic mostly. Other than the added complexity of high pressure fuel injection.

The rear spoiler is of the same design of the 996TT so it’s pricey to keep up with. And the clutch while being a wear item is still $5000.

So, in general, it’s a lot more upkeep compared to NA powered 997s.
__________________


lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2022, 01:43 PM   #2436
SCA
Jaded
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 9,097
Placing this here for future reference. 911 977 Engines & Bore Scoring - My Experience and Knowledge So Far. https://youtu.be/SGggQ-ooJwA *From January 2021.
SCA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2022, 03:44 PM   #2437
lemming
Western Anomaly
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,644
Quote:
Originally Posted by SCA View Post
Placing this here for future reference. 911 977 Engines & Bore Scoring - My Experience and Knowledge So Far. https://youtu.be/SGggQ-ooJwA *From January 2021.
12,000 pounds to rebuild the engine

And to be honest, i thought this was some less than anecdotal thing. This sounds more like Thanos —Inevitable. Due to cylinder head design for hot spots.

I guess this could happen to any engine? But it sure seems hyped up on M96 engines (997.1s).

Now I know. Look at the left side exhaust for asymmetric oil burning compared to the right side exhaust. Fun video. Thanks.
__________________


lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2022, 03:47 PM   #2438
lemming
Western Anomaly
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,644
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemming View Post
12,000 pounds to rebuild the engine

And to be honest, i thought this was some less than anecdotal thing. This sounds more like Thanos —Inevitable. Due to cylinder head design for hot spots.

I guess this could happen to any engine? But it sure seems hyped up on M96 engines (997.1s).

Now I know. Look at the left side exhaust for asymmetric oil burning compared to the right side exhaust. Fun video. Thanks.
Now I think I understand why my 996 C4S burnt oil.
__________________


lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2022, 03:55 PM   #2439
Nick M3
Relic
 
Nick M3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 12,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemming View Post
12,000 pounds to rebuild the engine

And to be honest, i thought this was some less than anecdotal thing. This sounds more like Thanos —Inevitable. Due to cylinder head design for hot spots.

I guess this could happen to any engine? But it sure seems hyped up on M96 engines (997.1s).

Now I know. Look at the left side exhaust for asymmetric oil burning compared to the right side exhaust. Fun video. Thanks.
Apparently it's much bigger issue on the 3.8 vs,. the 3.6 in the .1s. According to the Porsche tech I bought my spare S54 from, anyway.
__________________
2011 M3
2006 Sierra 2500HD 4WD LBZ/Allison
2004 X5 3.0i 6MT
1995 M3 S50B32
1990 325is
1989 M3 S54B32

Hers:
1989 325iX
1996 911 Turbo


Nick M3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-14-2022, 03:58 PM   #2440
lemming
Western Anomaly
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,644
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nick M3 View Post
Apparently it's much bigger issue on the 3.8 vs,. the 3.6 in the .1s. According to the Porsche tech I bought my spare S54 from, anyway.
Is this common across all engine designs?

Or is this endemic to the flat six?

And is there a sidedness? So is the scoring on the side of the cylinder wall that is on the bottom of the cylinder?
__________________


lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Washed the Saab today... (not dial-up friendly) TD Car Talk 21 03-22-2004 01:47 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 02:43 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums © 2003-2008, 'Mudgeon Enterprises - Site hosting by AYN & Associates, LLC