04-16-2005, 05:12 PM | #1 |
Carmudgeon
Join Date: Jul 2004
Carmudgeonly Ride: Invalid Carriage
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,932
|
Fun and fuel efficiency?
(Something that I've wanted to post here for a while but never got around to it :P )
TD had a thread here some time ago asking for help jogging his memory. His overall criteria was about finding new or used cars that were cheap, reliable, and daily-driveable but avoided fat-pig syndrome enough to have some semblance of fun-to-drive. Now with the price of gas in the news so much, let's run the same kind of thread again, only this time take gas mileage into account as one of your high priorities. What cars can you think of that get excellent gas mileage, but come stock with the kind of *feel* that carmudgeons like (or can be easily/cheaply modded to achieve said goal)? I'm not naming any hard mileage cut-off points, but figure at least 25 city (and realistically, try to shoot for 30+ city MPG and more than 35 highway MPG). |
04-16-2005, 05:16 PM | #2 |
Mugwump
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: E46 330i, Chevy Colorado, Tesla Model 3
Location: NY
Posts: 17,475
|
E30 318is
Or did you mean new? |
04-16-2005, 05:19 PM | #3 |
Butting in.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 4,553
|
Miata. Duh.
Z3 1.9 is fun with suspension mods. What kind of mileage does the Elise get?
__________________
The question is not whether I've treated you rudely, but whether you've ever heard me treat anyone else better. -H. Higgins |
04-16-2005, 08:30 PM | #4 | |
Carmudgeon
Join Date: Jul 2004
Carmudgeonly Ride: Invalid Carriage
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,932
|
Quote:
It's interesting that the Elise was brought up. After going away to do something for a while I thought back to this and recalled that the Elise had some high MPG figures IIRC. |
|
04-16-2005, 08:39 PM | #5 |
Western Anomaly
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,612
|
acura RSX?
MCS? (elise, of course).
__________________
|
04-16-2005, 08:47 PM | #6 |
Tilting Rocinante
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Havre de Grace, MD
Posts: 6,244
|
My candidates would have to have a useable back seat and rear wheel drive.
Alex |
04-16-2005, 08:47 PM | #7 | |
Carmudgeon
Join Date: Jul 2004
Carmudgeonly Ride: Invalid Carriage
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,932
|
Quote:
I thought about both the RSX and the MCS, but unfortunately picking the higher-up engine options in both models result in a mileage penalty. Still reasonable though. Edit: Damn, Type-S takes a 4MPG hit in the city compared to the regular model, 3 on the highway. That and a required switch from regular to premium. |
|
04-16-2005, 08:51 PM | #8 | |
Western Anomaly
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,612
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
04-18-2005, 02:42 PM | #9 |
redefined
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,896
|
lotus elise
but actually the real world MPG numbers aren't that great. even the EPA stickers were a lot lower than what people were saying before the cars started arriving. I only seem to be getting about 20 mpg
__________________
"There's a freedom you begin to feel the closer you get to Austin, Texas." -Willie |
04-18-2005, 03:04 PM | #10 |
195
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,611
|
330i--gas mileage in the upper 20s at 80+ on the highway. Not going to win any Greenpeace awards, but not bad. Better than the WRX, actually.
MC/MCS, obviously. Skystice Probably the new GTI Mazda3 Focus (SVT or the new 2.3) I wonder how the Neon SRT does when driven off-boost |
Bookmarks |
|
|