05-16-2008, 01:38 PM | #1 |
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,514
|
Is this a dumb idea (3rd vehicle)?
What do y'all think of a CPO'ed X5 as a 3rd vehicle? I'm browsing the CPO site, and seeing some 2004 examples with ~50K miles, right at around $26K. Subtract several grand because SUV's aren't selling right now, and it could probably be a pretty nice setup for right around $20K.
Towing capacity for the 3.0 is 6000 pounds, which would be more than plenty to haul my S2000 to MN. And it's rated at 21 MPG HWY. Anyone know how good the X5 is at meeting/beating the HWY estimates? I don't know, just tossing around some ideas as I think about the alternative of driving the S2000 that entire distance (um, no thanks). And needing something for next winter anyhow. Then there's the V8 4Runner... |
05-16-2008, 01:46 PM | #2 |
Relic
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: A very fast golf cart
Location: The Valley of the Sun
Posts: 12,821
|
the only thing you may want to keep in mind is the CPO warranties are for a total of 6 years from the original in-service date (or 100k miles). The '04s would expire anytime from late 2009 to summer of 2010 -- so it might be worth finding an '05 with similar mileage.
Don't have any highway mileage experience in an X5, but our X3 3.0 gets between 22-24 on the highway (and 17-19 in town)... the X5 is probably a bit heavier -- so 21 probably makes sense.
__________________
ZBB |
05-16-2008, 01:49 PM | #3 |
Vicarious Twitterer
Join Date: May 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: 06 330 cic ZHP
Location: CT
Posts: 7,566
|
One alternative for driving the S2k to MN is to have it shipped - that's much less than the cost of an X5.
OTOH, I spent an afternoon driving an 06 X5 3.0 - I averaged 18 mpg and was quite taken with the ride/handling and steering for such a large and heavy vehicle. I'd stay away from the v8 models, however, as reliability hasn't been so good. Ed |
05-16-2008, 01:53 PM | #4 |
The user formerly known as rwg
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: Z4
Location: Vegas baby!
Posts: 8,261
|
I am sure it will be more fun to drive then the 4Runner, but it might not deal with the snow as well. I suppose that choice would depend on what you expect to do with it the most. I would pick the X5 over the 4 Runner for on road use any day.
How many days does it snow where you are going? If it dumps a ton once a week, you get 6 days of clear roads and one day of needing the snow capacity every week. If it's the other way around . . . |
05-16-2008, 02:40 PM | #5 | |||
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,514
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I would be doing some mild off-roading on occasion (nothing like Lupinsea does), which the 4Runner would be much better at. So there's that. |
|||
05-16-2008, 02:51 PM | #6 |
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,514
|
I guess another thing to consider is that the X5 probably requires premium fuel, whereas the 4Runner does not.
|
05-16-2008, 02:59 PM | #7 |
Relic
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: A very fast golf cart
Location: The Valley of the Sun
Posts: 12,821
|
May be a wash -- depends on the MPG difference... You're probably talking ~$4.50 per tank of gas higher cost -- and a 2 MPG difference would make premium less expensive over time...
__________________
ZBB |
05-16-2008, 03:08 PM | #8 |
•••••••
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: '11 1M
Location: Churzee
Posts: 17,741
|
yes.
__________________
2011 1M |
05-16-2008, 03:14 PM | #9 |
Mugwump
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: E46 330i, Chevy Colorado, Tesla Model 3
Location: NY
Posts: 17,475
|
yes
|
05-16-2008, 03:25 PM | #10 |
redefined
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,884
|
yes
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|