carmudgeons.com  

Go Back   carmudgeons.com > Automotive Forums > Car Talk > Perseverators Anonymous

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-13-2016, 01:05 PM   #71
bren
lawn boy
 
bren's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: e46m3, f25x3,C5 Z06, C4 Vette, 06 CTD Ram, and a trailer
Location: Maryland
Posts: 14,029
Since apparently looks aren't relevant, I'm surprised you'd pick the Juke over a Cherokee or even the Renegade.
bren is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-14-2016, 09:10 PM   #72
Biggins
Crotchety
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Carmudgeonly Ride: 22 Tiguan, 11 328i
Posts: 912
I don't hate the juke, but it's still not close to the practicality of the HR-V or the looks of the CX-3. I think there are better options, but maybe you could go for the Nismo RS version? They're at least pretty zippy and maybe come in manual...

I think a Mazda3 hatch, Focus ST, or Civic Si sedan could be replacement options too?
Biggins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-15-2016, 05:49 AM   #73
John V
No more BMWs
 
John V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,753
Not that this is a sure-fire indicator of anything, but didn't the HR-V finish at the bottom of a recent C+D test of these sort of things?
John V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-17-2016, 04:12 PM   #74
Biggins
Crotchety
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Carmudgeonly Ride: 22 Tiguan, 11 328i
Posts: 912
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V View Post
Not that this is a sure-fire indicator of anything, but didn't the HR-V finish at the bottom of a recent C+D test of these sort of things?
I don't doubt that because it has an anemic motor and CVT, but it definitely has far more interior space than anything in its class. We're getting a CX-5/CR-V-sized thing next , but I understand the appeal of these smaller "city" SUVs. People like to sit up high and pretend AWD is their savior in rain/snow.

I'd still rather have a Mazda3, Focus/Fiesta ST, or Civic Si sedan than one of these small SUVs.
Biggins is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-18-2016, 01:23 PM   #75
lupinsea
Jeeped
 
lupinsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Modified Jeep Tj and '07 Miata
Location: Seattle
Posts: 10,214
I really would prefer the CX-3. The styling is fantastic, it seems to get rave reviews on it's handling and fun-to-driveiness, and I was very impressed at the interior when I sat in one at the dealership. The cramped cargo issue doesn't concern me as nearly anything is an improvement over the Miata. But it's too new which means it hasn't depreciated enough on the used market to get within our price range.

Our price point was $12k and I can probably stretch it to $14k.

Which sucks because it's a few thousand less than what's needed for more interesting cars. Let me rephrase that. At $12-14k we can either get interesting cars that are older or in poorer condition and / or higher milage (requiring more maintenance / repairs) or a new-enough car and low-enough milage but are otherwise lame. And I'm really resistant to getting an older car that will need more repairs.

Basically at that price point none of the Fiesta / Focus ST's are in range (which I'd be very interested in a Focus ST, too). The regular Focus is but I was so underwhelmed when I test drove one that, well, hm, I'll drive another before I completely rule it out but the whole thing was just "mushy".

I like the current gen Mazda3 but it's out of our price range and the previous gen Mazda3 is looking dated. . . . to the point I'd prefer the Juke's fugly styling to the last Mazda3. Weird, I know.

Golfs . . . there's a premium on those and again, older and higher milage / repairs or newer and out of our price range. Though with the current VW problems I don't know what the current market is like vs. 5 months ago.

Cherokee / Renegade. . . meh. Same too-new problem with the CX-3. . . . priced too high for us. And, I recently rode in the Cherokee, wow, lame. Completely characterless.



As for a particular Juke model:

AWD or manual, but not both
And at this point I'm more interested in the AWD. By the sound of it the torque vectoring AWD systems sounds like it's used to improved the handling and help rotate the car through the corners quicker. Plus the AWD has an independent multi-link rear suspension vs. the FWD with the torsion beam rear. And given that most of the time this will get driven in rush hour traffic, not having a manual would be nice. I've test driven the CVT AWD Juke and my FIL's CVT Nissan Cube . . . they're "fine." Not much worse than other automatics I've driven other than an odd disconnect from what I'm used to between the engine RPM note, vehicle speed, and throttle input.

Nismo RS models
Cool but out of our price range. Also, this only bumps power by 9hp and torque by 7 lb-ft, firms up an already sporty-isn suspension, and adds 18" wheels. The rest of the Nismo stuff is all cosmetic. And the oldest Nismo is a 2014 vs. 2011 for the regular Juke. Basically it's a $4-5k price difference on the used market. I don't think it's worth price premium even if it were in our price range.

Trim Levels
Looking over what you get at the different trim levels I actually prefer the base model. All Jukes have the same 1.6L DI turbo motor. All trims are available with AWD. However, the base comes with power locks / windows, steering wheel controls for radio and cruise control, and a simple knob-based A/C HVAC layout which is what I prefer. Stepping up from there is just creature comforts, cosmetic trim, and more technology than I want (I actually don't want the in-dash navigation or the touch-panel HVAC controls) and don't want to pay for.

So . . . . there it is.

Who knows. We'll see where our budget is at once my wife gets a job and if we can stretch it perhaps I'll resurvey the used car landscape again and see what's available.

And maybe this might not be so long term. I figure to get about 4 years of use out of the Miata replacement but maybe in 2-3 we can switch out for something else.
__________________
.


"Jeep is the only true American sports car*" - Enzo Ferrari

* Or something to that effect.
lupinsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 07:38 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums © 2003-2008, 'Mudgeon Enterprises - Site hosting by AYN & Associates, LLC