![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#451 |
dogged
Join Date: Dec 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: '22 M440 xDrive GC
Posts: 12,988
|
Whoa. Just saw this. What a mess.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#452 |
No more BMWs
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,740
|
The state of my short block for the past two weeks. Rings gapped, cylinders honed, measured and cleaned, bearing clearances measured. Crank, oil pump, rear main seal installed. So basically all of the time-consuming work has been done. It just needs pistons. I've been waiting on them for a month. They were supposed to ship last Friday, but the manufacturer encountered delays in final machining. Now they're supposed to ship (overnight) on Friday, to get to me on Saturday). I'm not holding my breath.
I leave for Toledo on Wednesday, with or without the car. I'm kind of excited about this engine. It's now an Ecoboost crank (which is forged, 94mm stroke rather than the 100mm stroke of the cast 2.5 crank). Same 89mm bore, so it's now 2.34L, down from 2.49L. Pistons are now 2618 forgings, much stronger than the prior pistons. Upgraded to Ecoboost sodium-filled exhaust valves. It should make as much power as the last one. It might make a little less power from 3500-4500 RPM but I was always limiting boost at low RPM anyway since it would just knock the tires off. The shorter stroke gives me more RPM headroom. Safe upper limit should be 8500 RPM now - don't think I'll ever go there, but being able to routinely spin to 7500-7800 would be really nice. Also new engine mounts, something I CAD'ed up and bought from SendCutSend.com, then welded up. Much nicer than my old hacked-together tubular mounts. JV |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#453 |
195
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,396
|
Is the block still a basic 2.5L block? And when you say eco boost, is that the 2.0 or the 2.3?
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#454 |
No more BMWs
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,740
|
It's a basic 2.5L block.
The 94mm crank is the 2.3L unit. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#455 |
195
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,396
|
Gordon Murray also apparently enjoys a built Duratec:
https://www.theautopian.com/mclaren-...d-masterpiece/ |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#456 |
No more BMWs
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,740
|
Pretty cool, odd though that he didn't use a VVT head. That's just throwing power away for no good reason.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#457 |
195
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,396
|
Trying to replicate the peakier power delivery of the original? Idk, that’s the only thing I can think.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#458 |
No more BMWs
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,740
|
A lot of people don't run VVT because their engine management solutions can't run it. But when running a factory ECU is so easy, there's really no reason to use anything else for a street car.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#459 |
Relic
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 12,374
|
I'm going to guess that it's related to the ITBs and etc.
__________________
2011 M3 2006 Sierra 2500HD 4WD LBZ/Allison 2004 X5 3.0i 6MT 1995 M3 S50B32 1990 325is 1989 M3 S54B32 Hers: 1989 325iX 1996 911 Turbo ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#460 |
No more BMWs
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,740
|
What would itbs have to do with vvt? If anything I'd want vvt more with an ITB motor
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|