carmudgeons.com  

Go Back   carmudgeons.com > Automotive Forums > Car Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 02-26-2008, 11:57 AM   #21
rumatt
Mugwump
 
rumatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: E46 330i, Chevy Colorado, Tesla Model 3
Location: NY
Posts: 17,475
Quote:
Originally Posted by ff View Post
If the MINI was RWD, the point of the car would remain the same.
And it would be less sux0rs.
rumatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 12:33 PM   #22
Rob
The user formerly known as rwg
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: Z4
Location: Vegas baby!
Posts: 8,261
Congrats Plaz!

If it makes you feel any better, I agree about the tires based on my one experience with Contisport Contacts that came on the '01 330. They were so bad after about 7k miles I have never bought another Continental tire. I was hoping for the Michelins on the new car, but I didn't win the tire lottery and got the Bridgestones. It's no big deal though - it's not like they will last very long.

It's amazing how good the current generation of bluetooth and ipod integration are (and my opinion comes without having the nav screen).

Can't wait to hear how you like it after the break in. And to see pictures with whatever wheels you chose. And to see how well you adjust to fwd.
Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 12:34 PM   #23
zach
swinging for the fences
 
zach's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: 987, X7 M60i, e36 M3
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 5,034
congrats, plaz! I look forward to pictures.
zach is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 12:42 PM   #24
Plaz
•••••••
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: '11 1M
Location: Churzee
Posts: 17,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by rumatt View Post
Let me handle this one for him.

RWD: Roxors

FWD: Suxors
I can't really argue that point.

But I will say that the MCS is quite a bit smaller, a bit lower, and a LOT lighter, and you can certainly feel it. In a lot of ways, it feels like what I was trying to make my E46 feel like.
__________________
2011 1M
Plaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 12:43 PM   #25
Sharp11
Vicarious Twitterer
 
Join Date: May 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: 06 330 cic ZHP
Location: CT
Posts: 7,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by ff View Post
If the MINI was RWD, the point of the car would remain the same.
Except it wouldn't be.

The Mini succeeds because of its packaging - there's no room for a rear drive set up in a car that small.

In the old days, it would've been a rear engine model if rear drive were to be specified.

Ed
Sharp11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 01:02 PM   #26
FC
Solving problems
 
FC's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: M5 / 718 GTS / Cooper S / GTI / LR4
Location: Metro Boston
Posts: 25,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plaz View Post
I can't really argue that point.

But I will say that the MCS is quite a bit smaller, a bit lower, and a LOT lighter, and you can certainly feel it. In a lot of ways, it feels like what I was trying to make my E46 feel like.
The small size, lightness, and price (relative to other cars I like that all seem to be in the 40-60K range) make it very appealing to me. If we got one, we would keep it indefinitely. It would be the wife's car/city car/extra car. How to justify getting one is the issue. But if dynamically it compares favorably with an E46 , then it has a chance. Soon enough it will warm up and I'll go check it out. I still do want to check out/drive the full JCW version though.
FC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 07:58 PM   #27
lemming
Western Anomaly
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,593
i know we all have a RWD bias, but go here:

http://www.dpcars.net/

and while trying to avoid getting distracted by dp's other cars, when you get around to his MCS, you'll click on the pages and see that it's pretty track-able.
__________________


lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 08:30 PM   #28
Sharp11
Vicarious Twitterer
 
Join Date: May 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: 06 330 cic ZHP
Location: CT
Posts: 7,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemming View Post
i know we all have a RWD bias, but go here:

http://www.dpcars.net/

and while trying to avoid getting distracted by dp's other cars, when you get around to his MCS, you'll click on the pages and see that it's pretty track-able.
No one should be surprised.

Minis have been successful race cars for decades - the original incarnation was a rally champ in the 60's.

In today's ultra-competitive touring class, FWD cars do quite well indeed - Acuras, Mazda3's etc. door handle to door handle with BMW's, the new Caddy's and AWD Audis.

Ed
Sharp11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 08:31 PM   #29
equ
Alphanumeric
 
equ's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: 981S, 340i
Posts: 9,583
Quote:
Originally Posted by FC View Post
If we got one, we would keep it indefinitely.
Just keep the zhp indefinitely, it's a very, very good car. Then when you have the desire and the time go here:

http://mike.focke.googlepages.com/bu...97-2004boxster
equ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-26-2008, 09:00 PM   #30
lemming
Western Anomaly
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plaz View Post
Will post a more thorough review once I've had more seat time, but so far a few impressions, starting with some "T" words that come to mind:

Torquey
Tiny
Tight
Tossable
Terrible Tires (Continental all-season runflats... that's three strikes. They'll be fine for winters, I suppose.)

The JCW exhaust/intake combo is awesome. Very sonorous, in a deep, 6-cyl. sounding way. It's a little loud and bassy inside when pushing it, but I like that.

Still getting used to the "hill holder" feature. It's a little disorienting... I imagine I'll acclimate to it.

The car has plenty of go. Agree with (JST's?) assertion that it really doesn't need more engine... no regret on not waiting for factory JCW.

Mild torque steer is there, but I think it's got very different characteristics than in the open diff'd car I test drove. It's probably more noticeable as the LSD tries to correct all the time, but less severe. With the open diff, I imagine once the TS takes hold, it's unrestrained... the LSD tries to reign things back in, and you feel it trying to return to center. It'll take some getting used to, but it feels strangely appropriate for the car.

Armrest annoyingly gets in way of inside-side seat adjusters... (backrest angle, lumbar)

Visibility MUCH better than the RX-8... I feel like I'm in a huge greenhouse.

Steering, clutch, shifter all wonderful. The throw is maybe just a little bit long, and the knob sucks, but the gates feel great. Gear ratios seem perfect.

Bluetooth works great. Paired up effortlessly with by BBerry 8800 (once I realized I needed to disconnect from my Jawbone headset), and immediately downloaded address book from it.

IPod integration works great. Wonderful to have playlists right in the nav, and even scroll through artists and albums. Even the smart playlists appear.

Still playing with the voice commands. When I've known exactly what command to use, it's seemed to work very well.

Lots of fun so far!
so you think the JCW package is worth it?

__________________


lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:31 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums © 2003-2008, 'Mudgeon Enterprises - Site hosting by AYN & Associates, LLC