04-07-2020, 11:17 AM | #21 |
195
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,593
|
Maybe it helps with fleet fuel efficiency numbers?
|
04-07-2020, 11:20 AM | #22 |
Relic
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 12,438
|
25/29 vs. 24/29 doesn’t really seem like enough to justify, but that’s the first answer that makes any sense to me.
__________________
2011 M3 2006 Sierra 2500HD 4WD LBZ/Allison 2004 X5 3.0i 6MT 1995 M3 S50B32 1990 325is 1989 M3 S54B32 Hers: 1989 325iX 1996 911 Turbo |
04-07-2020, 01:00 PM | #23 |
Carmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,224
|
Agree it's hard to make sense of - i dont think Audi offers FWD versions of the q5 and MB doesn't offer RWD versions of the GLC. BMW is very
REgardless, I think the X3 (even in 4 cyl trim) is my favorite of all the compact crossovers. Seems to have the best balance of looks/size/practicality/performance/dynamics/fuel econ/tech. Personally, I'd be hard-pressed to not get the b58 engine though. |
04-07-2020, 02:30 PM | #24 | |
Carmudgeon
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 4,646
|
Quote:
Sports cars I feel differently with plus with the Mid engine and rear engine cars I have they grip really well. BTW the car overall was excellent, I liked it very much. |
|
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|