carmudgeons.com  

Go Back   carmudgeons.com > Automotive Forums > Car Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 06-19-2006, 10:17 AM   #1
John V
No more BMWs
 
John V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,753
I drove a couple of neat cars this weekend





It's a third-gen RX-7 with an LS1 350 / 6-speed manual out of a Camarochicken. Weighs about 2800lbs and I think the engine is stock, so about 320hp at the crank.

The guy did the install himself, and it turned out surprisingly well. The car he started with was a complete piece of junk like most third gen RX-7s, but the drivetrain worked great. Even his wiring was relatively neat and tidy. It had some kind of coilover setup on it. It was very well balanced and obviously very fast! It put the power down well despite the street tires and lots of worn bushings in the rear end.

Did I mention the guy only got the car driving the night before the autocross school? Yikes.

Other car of note was an NSX, unknown year. Here's a vid: http://fifthgearonline.com/ZylexSNL/...0--/NSX_01.MPG

Neat car, but sort of ... boring.
John V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 11:22 AM   #2
Sharp11
Vicarious Twitterer
 
Join Date: May 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: 06 330 cic ZHP
Location: CT
Posts: 7,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V
Neat car, but sort of ... boring.
As is the video, sort of like watching a confused fly from 200 feet away

Ed
Sharp11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 11:26 AM   #3
John V
No more BMWs
 
John V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,753
Yeah, it was an autocross level 1 school, and the lot we used is ridiculously small.

The gearing of the car was absurd as well. I think it ddi 45MPH in first gear, and 80+ in second.
John V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 11:46 AM   #4
ff
.
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,514
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V
Other car of note was an NSX, unknown year. Here's a vid: http://fifthgearonline.com/ZylexSNL/...0--/NSX_01.MPG
boom-boom-boom "Rev limiter!!" shift shift!!!
ff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 11:47 AM   #5
Sharp11
Vicarious Twitterer
 
Join Date: May 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: 06 330 cic ZHP
Location: CT
Posts: 7,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V
Yeah, it was an autocross level 1 school, and the lot we used is ridiculously small.

The gearing of the car was absurd as well. I think it ddi 45MPH in first gear, and 80+ in second.
It would've been fine had the videographer used a zoom or gotten closer.

There are three main autox's around here, one on a fairly small lot, one on a huge (but rough) lot and one on an airport runway (same course up and back).

They're all fun for different reasons, but sometimes I actually prefer the smallest lot as it really exploits one's ability to keep focused and precise. It also draws less of a testosterone-laden crowd which keeps things friendlier.

Only been to two this year as my current six day work-week of juggling two large projects is wiping me out till at least mid-July.

Ed
Sharp11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 12:53 PM   #6
lupinsea
Jeeped
 
lupinsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Modified Jeep Tj and '07 Miata
Location: Seattle
Posts: 10,214
Cool RX-7 project. Could you tell if the balance was messed up at all with such a comparatively heavy engine up front?

And the comment about the NSX looking like a confused fly seemed very appropriate. Couldn't help laughing when I saw that. To be fair, sometimes it's tough working the zoom function on a video camera without totally goofing the shot. You'd have to know where the car is going to be and anticipate when and where you'd need to adjust the zoom. Hard to do on a fast moving object without messing up the picture.

It would be fun to get into autocrossing again with the new BMW when it gets up here. But I'm wondering about the rear subframe tearing problem and how well the car could stand up to such viggors . . . .
lupinsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 02:30 PM   #7
John V
No more BMWs
 
John V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,753
The owner removed the AC and power steering and reported that the engine was no heavier than the twin-turbo rotary after that. The trans had to be heavier, but the car definitely still had the nimble RX-7 feel to it.
John V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2006, 04:31 PM   #8
lemming
Western Anomaly
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V
The owner removed the AC and power steering and reported that the engine was no heavier than the twin-turbo rotary after that. The trans had to be heavier, but the car definitely still had the nimble RX-7 feel to it.
contrary to what is intuitive, the "small blocks" are not really dimensionally large or dense.

pretty compact and light motors, esp. compared to a twin turbo setup --but they compare really favorably even to DOHC v6s in terms of packaging and weight.
__________________


lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:12 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums © 2003-2008, 'Mudgeon Enterprises - Site hosting by AYN & Associates, LLC