08-28-2006, 10:53 AM | #11 | |
No more BMWs
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,753
|
Quote:
I reckon the folks building these bikes don't give much though to that kind of thing, based on the number of choppers I've seen with no front brakes. |
|
08-28-2006, 12:36 PM | #12 | |
Slacker Extraordinaire
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Reno, NV
Posts: 3,722
|
Quote:
The "taking-off-the-left-hand-from-the-handlebar-to-shift" is a bit unnerving. And what further complicates the whole shifting process is the fact that this transmission was based on 1940s technology, and because there was a lot of "slop", had little to no feel in regards to what gear I was in. These bikes are not meant for performance, and the fact that they completely switch the controls to what we now think is "normal" reiterates it. I mean, why the hell build a bike with no front brakes when 70% or so of your braking is done there, right? The reason is, and the majority of the riding community might not agree with this, is for looks. There's something to be said about clean lines where there's not too many cables and levers and calipers and rotors ruining the look of the front end. And I think, and in my opinion, the whole foot clutch/hand-shift thing just makes motorcycling more fun.........if a bit more dangerous. Last edited by 3LOU5; 08-28-2006 at 12:40 PM. Reason: correction |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|