11-07-2013, 11:06 AM | #501 |
redefined
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 14,903
|
another fire, another big stock drop
|
11-07-2013, 11:13 AM | #502 |
lawn boy
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: e46m3, f25x3,C5 Z06, C4 Vette, 06 CTD Ram, and a trailer
Location: Maryland
Posts: 14,029
|
|
11-07-2013, 11:17 AM | #503 |
195
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,636
|
I dunno. You have to ask undefined. I don't think anything that's happened over the past few days undermines the long-term prospects of the company, which I think are pretty damn compelling. But the market moves to a different drummer.
On the 3rd fire, the rumor is that it started after the car ran over a tow hitch. Would that have caused a fire in a "normal" car? Eh, probably not. But it may well have resulted in similarly disabling damage. |
11-07-2013, 12:10 PM | #504 | |
Carmudgeon
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 3,253
|
Quote:
But the fact that the stock moves so much on trivial events reminds us all that it is a volatile stock that can have large moves for little reason. I agree with JST that if you like the long term prospects buy and hold (maybe don't even check the price regularly), but trying to speculate on the perfect "buy in" point is impossible. I do think they had an unusually long run of good luck where there was almost no "bad news", which always made me kind of nervous. Cause when the shoe does drop (and you know it will) the fall is harder. |
|
11-07-2013, 12:38 PM | #505 | |
Vicarious Twitterer
Join Date: May 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: 06 330 cic ZHP
Location: CT
Posts: 7,566
|
Quote:
I haven't read my weight tables chart in CR since last April's issue, but there are cars at least under 3000 lbs - the nearer to 2300 - 2600 lbs (or so) figure would be some of the new mini cars like the Fiat 500 (base) and Nissan Note. A car the size of the Tesla could be made much lighter, but it would require more advanced materials and construction techniques - I'd love to see a changeover and commitment like this, but significant partnership between private and public entities would likely be required ... hard to see happening in today's political climate. .... and then there's the steel industry to contend with. As an aside, my 2000 E320 weighs in at 3700lbs, which is light for a car of its size (by today's standards) - it turns in decent mileage (I'm averaging high 20's thanks to lots of highway driving). I understand the Tesla isn't about raw numbers at this point, but I wish there were more of a commitment to lighter weight via different materials, manner of construction etc. - the technology exists. |
|
11-07-2013, 01:03 PM | #506 | |
Hello.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Carmudgeonly Ride: '09 X3, '11 328xiT, '11 135i C, '17 c2, '19 X5
Location: Downingtown, PA
Posts: 5,542
|
Quote:
Off topic, but a friend of a friend lost his Cayman last week to an IMS failure. He missed the class action suit cut off date by less than a month. Edit, just heard Porsche is taking care of him with a remanufactured engine at their expense... $23k...
__________________
Josh (PA) - '19 X5 '17 991.2 C2 Cab '11 135i Convertible '11 328xiT '09 X3 Last edited by Josh (PA); 11-07-2013 at 01:25 PM. |
|
11-07-2013, 01:06 PM | #507 |
No more BMWs
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,753
|
Sure, it could be a bit lighter. It could also cost another $50k.
|
11-07-2013, 01:07 PM | #508 | |
Vicarious Twitterer
Join Date: May 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: 06 330 cic ZHP
Location: CT
Posts: 7,566
|
Quote:
In this country, if we're ever to truly rethink our source of energy and how we power vehicles, the commitment has to be a team effort, led with a fair degree of creativity and vision. The Tesla is a very nice car with a very high price tag, relatively heavy weight, small range and an excited base of enthusiasts willing to be early adopters. Right now for my purposes, the practical solution, if I were going plugin, would be to pick up a PI hybrid, like a Volt (no range issues) - then for local stuff - perhaps a Leaf. Best of both worlds for almost the cost of a Tesla. Last edited by Sharp11; 11-07-2013 at 01:24 PM. |
|
11-07-2013, 01:18 PM | #509 | |
195
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,636
|
Quote:
http://www.edmunds.com/car-reviews/t...alkaround.html Ed, the Tesla is pretty far along this path already. Look at this suspension walk-around; check out the lengths they've gone to even in the suspension to save weight. The rest of the car *is* light, being made primarily of aluminium. Yes, it could be lighter if they used carbon fiber or something, but then it would also be so expensive that even Silicon Valley tech mavens would think twice. And besides, it can only be so light, given that the battery weighs as much as it does. Criticizing the Tesla for not weighing half as much as it does is like criticizing the Boeing 707 for not being able to go Mach 3. I mean, it's a quantum leap past everything that's come before, and you're pissed that it doesn't leap far enough forward? In any event, the real problem with range isn't weight--it's drag. A car that weighed half as much as the Tesla probably would have slightly better range, but it wouldn't be as much better as you are thinking. |
|
11-07-2013, 01:32 PM | #510 | |
Vicarious Twitterer
Join Date: May 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: 06 330 cic ZHP
Location: CT
Posts: 7,566
|
Quote:
I'd also be concerned, being here in the NE, that extreme cold weather would compromise output while simultaneously expecting heating and defrosting elements to do their work. Perhaps if there were a real infrastructure in place for recharging, I'd feel differently. |
|
Bookmarks |
|
|