![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#31 |
Chief title editor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 23,123
|
Someone else on this forum has been texting me recently about this lens...
__________________
OH NOES!!!!!1 MY CAR HAS T3H UND3R5T33R5555!!!!!!1oneone!!!!11 Team WTF?! What are you gonna do? ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 | |
Old Fart
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 8,877
|
Quote:
I have the AF 300/4 and the AF-S 300/4. Love the handling of the former, but it's almost useless by hit rate (and by that, I mean that I get about equal outcomes with MF vs. AF). The latter is just too big and heavy. (Not longer, but much, much thicker and it weighs a lot more.) If only the D850 was cheaper. I want more megapixels than the D500 can offer. It bothers me to not have a meaningful pixel "premium" vs. the 5K iMac.
__________________
2006 GMC Sierra 2500HD 4WD LBZ/Allison 2002 BMW M3 1999 323i GTS2 1995 M3 S50B32, S6S420G, 3.91 1990 325is 1989 M3 Hers: 1988 325iX 1996 911 Turbo ![]() |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 | |
dogged
Join Date: Dec 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: '17 M240i; '17 718 Boxster S; '16 X5 50i MSport
Posts: 7,041
|
Quote:
The D850 margin for focus is pretty razor thin, so I'm not sure your hit rate would improve much with the 300 lenses...But it's decently fast with and without the grip to provide more opportunities for focus. Maybe Clyde needs to move this up to the photo forum... |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Bookmarks |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Nikon D700 plus Nikon grip; 17-35 2.8 lens; 50 1.4, etc. | wdc330i | The Marketplace | 0 | 09-19-2012 06:37 PM |
FS: Nikon D100 DSLR and Nikon F100 Film SLR | clyde | The Marketplace | 9 | 05-17-2006 07:01 PM |