06-12-2005, 04:03 PM | #1 |
Western Anomaly
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,611
|
what if XLR-V > m6 @ nordschleife?
there are some serious reports coming out that with the final baseline numbers being set, the STS-V and the XLR-V will have not just the 440hp but more like 470hp with almost the same torque.......makes one wonder how fast each car will be now on the nurburgring.
is it possible that the XLR-V (really a c6 with some ballast) could be quicker than the much vaunted M6? remember, the c5 z06 is 7:56-7:58 and the c6 z51 is supposed to be very close to that --the XLR-V could very well be a sub-8min car. i hope this is true. because it will mean that torque is as important as peak HP and it will be proven on the same track.
__________________
|
06-12-2005, 07:54 PM | #2 | |
Solving problems
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: M5 / 718 GTS / Cooper S / GTI / LR4
Location: Metro Boston
Posts: 25,263
|
Re: what if XLR-V > m6 @ nordschleife?
Quote:
Still, there is no reason to doubt that the XLR-V will at the very least come close to the the M6 if they were to test it. But honestly, let's be fair. A vanilla XLR costs close to 80K. An XLR-V is bound to push 90K. At that price, styling aside, most people will go with the M6 for the obvious reasons given the small price difference for the segment in question. |
|
06-12-2005, 07:57 PM | #3 | |
Butting in.
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: San Mateo, CA
Posts: 4,553
|
Re: what if XLR-V > m6 @ nordschleife?
Quote:
:P
__________________
The question is not whether I've treated you rudely, but whether you've ever heard me treat anyone else better. -H. Higgins |
|
06-12-2005, 08:05 PM | #4 | |
Carmudgeon
Join Date: Jul 2004
Carmudgeonly Ride: Invalid Carriage
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,932
|
Re: what if XLR-V > m6 @ nordschleife?
Quote:
What are you talkin' about? GM has publicized the useage of the Nordschleife for a lot of their cars (amusingly enough, the latest is their Trailblazer SS, polishing a turd if I ever saw it). This kind of testing by GM dates back to at latest the basic CTS. |
|
06-12-2005, 08:06 PM | #5 | ||
Carmudgeon
Join Date: Jul 2004
Carmudgeonly Ride: Invalid Carriage
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,932
|
Re: what if XLR-V > m6 @ nordschleife?
Quote:
^^Imagine that being a serious question 5 years ago. |
||
06-12-2005, 08:14 PM | #6 | ||
Solving problems
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: M5 / 718 GTS / Cooper S / GTI / LR4
Location: Metro Boston
Posts: 25,263
|
Re: what if XLR-V > m6 @ nordschleife?
Quote:
|
||
06-12-2005, 08:31 PM | #7 | |
Carmudgeon
Join Date: Jul 2004
Carmudgeonly Ride: Invalid Carriage
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,932
|
Re: what if XLR-V > m6 @ nordschleife?
Quote:
All Cadillacs CTS and later (excluding variants of escalade). V-models get a whole lot of 'Ring time. Cobalt SS, Trailblazer SS. It may become policy to wring out all SS cars there. Corvette C5 Z06 and up. C6 received a lot of 'Ring time, though lemming would never believe it. C6 Z06 practically is a Nordschleife/Milford special. A bunch more makes tests there of course, the usual Porsche/BMW models that seem to spontaneously generate themselves over there, etc etc. |
|
06-12-2005, 11:14 PM | #8 | ||
Western Anomaly
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,611
|
Re: what if XLR-V > m6 @ nordschleife?
Quote:
my hypothesis: the XLR-V is based on the c6 and the c6 z51 is within seconds of the c5 z06 on the nurburgring. the XLR is about 3500 pounds (mainly the retractable hardtop) but has an automatic but an amazingly flat power curve --think AMG. cubic inches plus forced induction plus DOHCs driving the pistons and valves. furthermore: the XLR-V will have multipiston brakes and tires as good as those found on the M6. to the question: will it be faster than the vaunted M6 on this famed german road course? if it indeed is, what does that say about which car is the driver's car and which one isn't? and what does that say about keeping things simple, as opposed to complex? execution is what matters, no? ergo, if the XLR-V is faster, it proves two points: power doesn't need to be complex from an engine and second, lighter weight is probably better than SMG or any rubber compound BMW will put on the M6 to keep it driveable.
__________________
|
||
06-13-2005, 01:59 PM | #9 |
The user formerly known as rwg
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: Z4
Location: Vegas baby!
Posts: 8,261
|
Lots of "ifs" in there. Plus, the M10 is normally aspirated. Does that matter? What about heat soak from the caddy?
Seriously, the fact that Cadillac is competing in this contest at all is great all by itself. mbr, GM liked the results of the testing the CTS-V on the 'ring so much, they are building a mini ring in Michigan for testing. Come to think of it, it's probably done now. Not as long, but supposedly contains all of the great bits for testing. I would be VERY surprised if all of the V models didn't get 'ring testing, even if it's just for marketing purposes. |
06-13-2005, 02:05 PM | #10 | |
195
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,611
|
Quote:
|
|
Bookmarks |
|
|