carmudgeons.com  

Go Back   carmudgeons.com > Automotive Forums > Car Talk > Perseverators Anonymous

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-04-2008, 07:27 AM   #21
lemming
Western Anomaly
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,612
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyMike View Post
+1

If so it explains a lot though. No wonder the lemm-ster's been throwing that Edmunds article around so stoicly. If the R32 had punked the MCS I'm sure suddenly the Edmunds writer would be a non-driving nematode and a douche bag.




i don't really get the jist of the R32 v MCS comparison, personally, as an objective exercise. i thought it was more useful to bring up shortcomings, of which there are plenty to be had, in the MCS, which, by and large that edmunds blog is pretty fair.

basically the r32 entirely stands for everything that the MINI does not. grand touring. really nice interior. i think that plays through in the writeup, too. i just want Ponderosa Plaz to know that there are plenty of downsides (objectively writing) to the MCS that come up over time after the initial test drive.
__________________


lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 09:10 AM   #22
IndyMike
Elected by grace
 
IndyMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Carmudgeonly Ride: 11 1 M; 11 328iT; 22 M240ix
Location: Brickyard
Posts: 1,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemming View Post
i don't really get the jist of the R32 v MCS comparison, personally, as an objective exercise. i thought it was more useful to bring up shortcomings, of which there are plenty to be had, in the MCS, which, by and large that edmunds blog is pretty fair.

basically the r32 entirely stands for everything that the MINI does not. grand touring. really nice interior. i think that plays through in the writeup, too. i just want Ponderosa Plaz to know that there are plenty of downsides (objectively writing) to the MCS that come up over time after the initial test drive.
I'm hyp.

I like the Mini and obviously since many enthusiast folks here currently have one (or had one previously) there must be something to them.

But regarding the R56 it just seems that I read and hear a lot of sound bites like the below which I copped from the recent MT COTY edition on-line.

"The second generation is more evolutionary than revolutionary. And in the time following the Mini's arrival, the GTI has arguably become king of this category, one we're not sure the new Mini can dethrone. Many judges also feel ergonomics have taken a step back: neither the center-stack controls nor the Mini's version of iDrive are intuitive. Offering go-kart fun in an incredibly charming package isn't enough for the Mini to earn the title of Car of the Year, especially when some aspects of the car aren't as good as those of the one it's replaced."

I think Plaz should also take the GTI for a spin for a good comparison.

Afterwards he may discover that the MCS only offers him a Plazebo effect.
IndyMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 09:20 AM   #23
BahnBaum
Tilting Rocinante
 
BahnBaum's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Havre de Grace, MD
Posts: 6,244
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyMike View Post
which I copped from the recent MT COTY edition on-line.
You lost me at MT.

Alex
__________________
BahnBaum is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 10:50 AM   #24
Sharp11
Vicarious Twitterer
 
Join Date: May 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: 06 330 cic ZHP
Location: CT
Posts: 7,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyMike View Post
Afterwards he may discover that the MCS only offers him a Plazebo effect.
Perhaps he's having second thoughts, having already complained of the plazticy interior ....

Ed
Sharp11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 11:12 AM   #25
Plaz
•••••••
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: '11 1M
Location: Churzee
Posts: 17,741
I did briefly mull over the GTI as a plazibility, but honestly, the car just holds no aesthetic appeal to me whatsoever.

Also, if I'm going to go small and light, I'd like the car to actually be small and light. The GTI is almost 500 lbs. heavier than the MINI.

I'm also very wary of VWAG products as they age... I've had several friends with old VWs and Audis, and read stories here and elsewhere about aging VWAG product, and not much of it is good.

__________________
2011 1M
Plaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 11:14 AM   #26
Plaz
•••••••
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: '11 1M
Location: Churzee
Posts: 17,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemming View Post
Ponderosa Plaz


__________________
2011 1M
Plaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 11:56 AM   #27
IndyMike
Elected by grace
 
IndyMike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Carmudgeonly Ride: 11 1 M; 11 328iT; 22 M240ix
Location: Brickyard
Posts: 1,962
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plaz View Post




I figured you were the 5th Cartwright or something.



Plaz is off to the side holding the horses.
IndyMike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 11:59 AM   #28
JST
195
 
JST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndyMike View Post
I'm hyp.

I like the Mini and obviously since many enthusiast folks here currently have one (or had one previously) there must be something to them.

But regarding the R56 it just seems that I read and hear a lot of sound bites like the below which I copped from the recent MT COTY edition on-line.

"The second generation is more evolutionary than revolutionary. And in the time following the Mini's arrival, the GTI has arguably become king of this category, one we're not sure the new Mini can dethrone. Many judges also feel ergonomics have taken a step back: neither the center-stack controls nor the Mini's version of iDrive are intuitive. Offering go-kart fun in an incredibly charming package isn't enough for the Mini to earn the title of Car of the Year, especially when some aspects of the car aren't as good as those of the one it's replaced."

I think Plaz should also take the GTI for a spin for a good comparison.

Afterwards he may discover that the MCS only offers him a Plazebo effect.
The GTI is a great car, but despite the price similarity it really is not the same category as the Mini. The GTI is real car; the Mini is (and I am going to get shit for this) a sports car, in the sense that it is a vehicle whose overall utility is vastly compromised in order to achieve its sporting mission. It's not as focused as a Cayman or Boxster, which are much more performance oriented. Superficially, it even resembles the GTI in layout. But it's so much smaller that it is not a substitute for a "real" car, any more than a Boxster or Cayman is.
JST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 12:33 PM   #29
Jeff_DML
Old Fart
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: T4R,GTI
Location: San Diego
Posts: 8,564
Quote:
Originally Posted by Plaz View Post
I'm thinking 17" O.Z. Ultraleggeras shod with 215/45/17 PS2s or Eagle GS-D3s would be great. But I don't know about their strength (I need strong wheels for NYC) -- my 18" BBS REs never had a problem on my E46 (they were stronger than the strut towers ), but those were way expensive, forged wheels.

It's either the Ultraleggeras for weight, or R99s for strength I think.
I was very impressed with the strength of my superleggeras,. They seemed a lot stronger then they should be since they are a lightweight cast wheel. They claim they have some sort of process to make them stronger then normal cast wheels. Anyways, assuming the ultraleggas are the same I recommend them.
Jeff_DML is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-04-2008, 12:54 PM   #30
Plaz
•••••••
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: '11 1M
Location: Churzee
Posts: 17,741
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jeff_DML View Post
I was very impressed with the strength of my superleggeras,. They seemed a lot stronger then they should be since they are a lightweight cast wheel. They claim they have some sort of process to make them stronger then normal cast wheels. Anyways, assuming the ultraleggas are the same I recommend them.
Good to hear. Thanks!
__________________
2011 1M
Plaz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 11:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums © 2003-2008, 'Mudgeon Enterprises - Site hosting by AYN & Associates, LLC