carmudgeons.com  

Go Back   carmudgeons.com > Automotive Forums > Car Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 04-09-2009, 12:02 PM   #21
rumatt
Mugwump
 
rumatt's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: E46 330i, Chevy Colorado, Tesla Model 3
Location: NY
Posts: 17,475
So let me see if I'm summarizing this properly:

I should buy a 60K M3 so I can race around in first gear. The rest of the time, despite the engine's awesome whizzing noises, the car is still slower than the 7-year old Z06.

Sweet.




EDIT: Isn't 1st gear where you care the least because you're already near the limits of the tires? I want more wheel torque in 2nd and 3rd, and I don't love having to shift out of 1st gear too soon.
rumatt is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 12:06 PM   #22
JST
195
 
JST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,593
The M3 and Z06 are also both slower than a fifteen year old Maclaren. So what?
JST is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 12:52 PM   #23
Rob
The user formerly known as rwg
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: Z4
Location: Vegas baby!
Posts: 8,261
I didn't think John was trying to say it was better than a vette. I thought he picked a car that is acknowledged as a beast to compare it to. It also lent weight to the discussion about how much of a difference gearing makes.
Rob is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 01:01 PM   #24
John V
No more BMWs
 
John V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,753
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rob View Post
I didn't think John was trying to say it was better than a vette. I thought he picked a car that is acknowledged as a beast to compare it to. It also lent weight to the discussion about how much of a difference gearing makes.
Right on. I found it interesting that a car most people describe as "torquey" (the Z06) puts less torque to the wheels, on average, than a car people tend to describe as "not torquey" (the M3).
John V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 01:09 PM   #25
Sharp11
Vicarious Twitterer
 
Join Date: May 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: 06 330 cic ZHP
Location: CT
Posts: 7,566
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V View Post
Right on. I found it interesting that a car most people describe as "torquey" (the Z06) puts less torque to the wheels, on average, than a car people tend to describe as "not torquey" (the M3).
It's a good point, it's all about perception - there's years of legacy behind a 'vette, and a lot of it has to do with its "brutishness" - people would never think of a BMW, any BMW quite this way.

Ed
Sharp11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 02:10 PM   #26
lupinsea
Jeeped
 
lupinsea's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Modified Jeep Tj and '07 Miata
Location: Seattle
Posts: 10,214
Quote:
Originally Posted by stuka View Post
Nerds


Good thread though.
__________________
.


"Jeep is the only true American sports car*" - Enzo Ferrari

* Or something to that effect.
lupinsea is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 02:19 PM   #27
ff
.
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,514
Agree, great thread.

John, do you have the graphs and calculations set up in Excel (or something similar)? It might be interesting to let people plug in values for other cars. Not that I would want you to do the work, but if we could leverage the work you did from another webpage here at 'mudgeons? Just a thought.
ff is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 02:24 PM   #28
Nick M3
Relic
 
Nick M3's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 12,438
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sharp11 View Post
It's a good point, it's all about perception - there's years of legacy behind a 'vette, and a lot of it has to do with its "brutishness" - people would never think of a BMW, any BMW quite this way.

Ed
Also because BMW gave the E90 M3 really soggy throttle response as a default.
__________________
2011 M3
2006 Sierra 2500HD 4WD LBZ/Allison
2004 X5 3.0i 6MT
1995 M3 S50B32
1990 325is
1989 M3 S54B32

Hers:
1989 325iX
1996 911 Turbo


Nick M3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 02:30 PM   #29
John V
No more BMWs
 
John V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Ram, MS3, CX-5, RX-8
Location: Glenwood, MD
Posts: 14,753
I did a quick calculation of the area under the torque curve for each engine. From 1,000 RPM to 6800 RPM for the Z06 and from 1000 RPM to 8400 RPM for the M3. The total area is shockingly close. The Z06 has 0.7% more total area under the curve than the M3.
John V is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 02:56 PM   #30
wdc330i
dogged
 
wdc330i's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: '22 M440 xDrive GC
Posts: 13,246
Shouldn't this thread be called "Talkin' Torque"?
wdc330i is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Torque Vectoring RMR Car Talk 4 12-11-2007 11:52 AM
let's have a poll: how much torque in the v8 M3? lemming Car Talk 20 09-10-2006 09:05 PM
torque v HP clyde Car Talk 6 01-17-2005 02:55 PM
how fast is fast, part II. (sub 11 second cars). lemming Car Talk 13 05-07-2004 09:31 PM


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:04 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums © 2003-2008, 'Mudgeon Enterprises - Site hosting by AYN & Associates, LLC