|
10-27-2005, 02:48 PM | #1 |
195
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,646
|
Is anyone else intrigued by the G6 GTP?
Saw one of these in CA, and I was surprised by how clean the exterior design was, and how un-shitty the interior (particularly the seats) looked.
This may not be a GTP, but it is a far cry from typical GM interior design (which in my mind is permanently represented by the 1984 Pontiac 6000 STE). The specs are certainly decent; 240 hp V6, good torque, 6 speed manual, 4 door. I know the reviews of the cooking variety G6 have been pretty lukewarm, but I have yet to see someone comment on the GTP. It's FWD, which means it isn't worth much as anything but a commuter, but it may be interesting enough to warrant a test drive. |
10-27-2005, 03:15 PM | #2 |
lawn boy
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: e46m3, f25x3,C5 Z06, C4 Vette, 06 CTD Ram, and a trailer
Location: Maryland
Posts: 14,029
|
What's with the one little bit of wood trim around the shifter?
|
10-27-2005, 03:27 PM | #3 |
Founder emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 21,007
|
As one might imply from my thread this afternoon, if I were going to go with a FWD commuter, it's going to be a TSX not some plastic Pontiac POS.
And if I could mentally get over the idea of driving a Pontiac, I'd just get a GTO. I'm glad GM is improving their products. But this type of incremental improvement will not save them. They need something so good and different from the crap they've peddled in the past to make a clean break in eveyone's minds. Hell, if Hyundai can do it, why can't GM? |
10-27-2005, 03:41 PM | #4 | |
Chief title editor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 26,599
|
Quote:
__________________
OH NOES!!!!!1 MY CAR HAS T3H UND3R5T33R5555!!!!!!1oneone!!!!11 Team WTF?! What are you gonna do? |
|
10-27-2005, 04:07 PM | #5 | |
195
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,646
|
Quote:
While you are right, clyde, that there are a lot of loyal customers out there that don't perceive things the way that ff and TD do, there aren't enough of them. There are more customers out there that (accurately) perceive the Accord and Camry as better attempts to address the basic transportation question than anything that either Ford or GM has sold recently. Upsetting the applecart isn't necessary; we're not talking about building G35s instead of Impalas. We're talking about building Impalas that are as good (or better than) Accords, building CTSs that are better than G35s, and building G6s that are better than Jettas. Why can't GM and Ford do that? Shamefully, I think they can. They just haven't. |
|
10-27-2005, 11:44 PM | #6 | |
Chief title editor
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 26,599
|
Quote:
__________________
OH NOES!!!!!1 MY CAR HAS T3H UND3R5T33R5555!!!!!!1oneone!!!!11 Team WTF?! What are you gonna do? |
|
10-27-2005, 04:18 PM | #7 |
Founder emeritus
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Maryland
Posts: 21,007
|
Hey!
Stop lumping me in with ff. I would not buy a Pontiac. But that doesn't mean I think the CTS-V or Corvette are crap either. Of the Big 3, it seems GM is most behind the curve in terms of offering world-class products. And I'm not really referring to "quality" (in terms of things breaking) but rather "perceived quality" (plastic-y with awful seats vs smooth moving switchgear and supportive seats) as well as overall appeal. Chrysler figured out how to make their line "bling". But GM (except for a few exceptions in their product lines) have vehicles that scream "Blindly Loyal and Ignorant Buy American-type". I mean, who would buy a base G6 over, say, an Accord? |
10-27-2005, 04:52 PM | #8 | |
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,514
|
Quote:
Yeah, me too. Hey wait... I was actually going to post a new thread about the new lineup of Pontiacs. How they have really turned that division around with decent-looking styling, and not-so-cheasy fit and finish. Gone are the days of the Pontiac ribbed body cladding and P145 95R14 tires. From a distance, the interior of that G6 looks rather nice. Dare I even say "sporty". I'm sure a closer inspection would reveal the same old cheap GM plastics, but at least it looks the part for once. |
|
10-27-2005, 05:06 PM | #9 |
Jeeped
Join Date: Sep 2005
Carmudgeonly Ride: Modified Jeep Tj and '07 Miata
Location: Seattle
Posts: 10,214
|
Not I. But then I find the Accord (and especially the Camary) to be very bland, too.
Personally, I wouldn't have a problem "buying American" and a patriotic part of me would prefer to. Unfortunately, there's not a whole lot the Big 2 1/2 make that I want. This due to reasons ranging the gamut from the fit and finish, to reliability, to the cars themselves. For instance, the new Mustangs certainly seems to be a big improvement over the past model generation. Power is impressive in the V8 version for a car at that price point. Styling, while retro, is probably one of the better renditions out of Ford lately. But it's just not a car that grabs my interest. I don't get the retention of the solid rear axle. The car seems quite heavy. And I'm not convinced it will hold up well over time. The size of the car seems fairly large, too. For the same cost I'd rather go for a new MX-5, RX-8, or (gasp) even the Solstice. Speaking of Solstice and Pontiac. . . they certainly seem to be moving in a better direction but they product offerings still seem to be so so. I was excited to see the Solstice come to fruition and hit the market if for no other reason than its seems to be an amazing offering from Pontiac. By the reports I've read GM hit it reasonably close on the head with their first attempt. All the good basics are there with AL double wishbone suspension at all four corners, rear wheel drive, close-ratio manual tranny, styling that I think is better than its competitor, surprisingly good handling considering it's a Pontiac, etc. It's very frustrating to me to see our home-town car manufacturers producing such uninspiring cars. Certainly they have the resources to make some good competitors to the cars JST mentioned in his last post. Whey they don't I have no clue. . . I mean, as long as they're making the things, why not make them good. There are things such as the CTS-V or the Corvette that really do stand out, but why does that have to be the exception? GM produces some cool concepts but then nothing happens with them. This is a case-in-point. Wish they brought this car to market:
Last edited by lupinsea; 10-27-2005 at 05:23 PM. |
10-27-2005, 05:42 PM | #10 |
Western Anomaly
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,669
|
it's refreshing how intelligent you guys can be sometimes.
so, putting aside the financial woes, which are mainly attributable to a legion of retired workers with super-high health care costs...... ...the question boils down to: why cannot GM recapture market share? i get reminded constantly that back in the day Chevrolet dominated with some ridiculous market share percentage and what chevy did in terms of pricing was followed in lockstep by the others. it's simple: it's the wrong business model. back then, there was no competition and now competition is fierce so they will never, ever achieve more than 30% market share ever again. morons if they think otherwise. when i say wrong business model: i mean it. their business model is predicated on pure gross sales numbers and not per car and when it is per car, like the truck debacle, they get hosed because they're too shortsighted to innovate with more crossover vehicles. their cars suffer from typical lowest cost bidder mentality, which worked for awhile, but clearly it does not work anymore. but also think about how difficult it is for them to change. i can already see the changes, but at the same time, i, like most of you, have also experienced the levels of fit and finish that BMW or lexus bring to their products and GM is still lagging behind them in fit and finish. at the same time, though, a lot of it IS perception. i've sat inside the new BMWs and i'm not blown away like i was when i first bought one. there are plenty of places where the interiors look very cheap and nasty, especially compared to the interiors of the e34 and e30. same for lexus. i've been inside a brand new rx330. it was well put together, but was i blown away by the quality of the materials? no. not at all. the perception gap is, as always, far larger than the real gap. i personally wouldn't mind a g6 gtp 6speed for commuting. i can already tell you that in the most important commuting parameter: acceleration, it would be right there with a 330 so much so that it would annoy the 330 owner who has this grandiose vision of sitting in the ultimate driving machine but why can't i shake this GTP or accord v6 coupe off of my tail? torque reigns supreme for commuting and the GTP trumps most comers in that parameter.
__________________
|
Bookmarks |
|
|