|
05-05-2009, 11:49 AM | #1 |
195
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 24,652
|
Edmunds runs the numbers--G8 GXP v. M3
http://blogs.edmunds.com/straightlin...ac-g8-gxp.html
Interesting link and data. The G8, it's important to recognize, is an auto. The bottom line is that the M3 and G8 are neck and neck at lower speeds, and even in the 1/4 are only 2/10s of a second apart (though the M3 has by the end of the 1/4 opened up a 2.2 mph speed advantage, which is not nothing). Both cars are very, very fast--while the G8 just misses being a 12 second car, it's damn close. Two interesting things about the article. One, Edmunds says of the M3 "Very tricky to launch well given light clutch effort, it's bog or boil. Seems too easy to blow off the tires despite minimal torque down low. It's very deceptive in this regard." Apparently they haven't read JV's discussion of torque and gearing. Second, check out the slalom times--that's where the big performance difference emerges. The M3 is 7 mph faster through the slalom than the G8, which is pretty remarkable. |
05-05-2009, 11:58 AM | #2 |
Solving problems
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: M5 / 718 GTS / Cooper S / GTI / LR4
Location: Metro Boston
Posts: 25,304
|
|
05-05-2009, 12:02 PM | #3 |
.
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 13,514
|
Imagine how fast the G8 would be if it didn't weigh 2 freaking tons.
|
05-05-2009, 12:14 PM | #4 |
Mugwump
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: E46 330i, Chevy Colorado, Tesla Model 3
Location: NY
Posts: 17,475
|
|
05-05-2009, 12:17 PM | #5 |
•••••••
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: '11 1M
Location: Churzee
Posts: 17,741
|
Yes, it's closer to a metric buttload.
__________________
2011 1M |
05-05-2009, 12:24 PM | #6 |
Mugwump
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: E46 330i, Chevy Colorado, Tesla Model 3
Location: NY
Posts: 17,475
|
I've never understood why a clutch stiffness is so important. Isn't feel more important than stiffness? And aren't they independent?
(let's get all the 'that's what she said' jokes out of the way quickly and move on...) |
05-05-2009, 12:36 PM | #7 | |
Relic
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 12,490
|
Quote:
Edit: Pedals that are too light increase driving effort dramatically for me. The light gas pedal was the number one reason why I got rid of my '02 WRX - having to hold my foot in place constantly was really fucking annoying.
__________________
2011 M3 2006 Sierra 2500HD 4WD LBZ/Allison 2004 X5 3.0i 6MT 1995 M3 S50B32 1990 325is 1989 M3 S54B32 Hers: 1989 325iX 1996 911 Turbo |
|
05-05-2009, 12:43 PM | #8 | |
The user formerly known as rwg
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: Z4
Location: Vegas baby!
Posts: 8,261
|
Quote:
I prefer a decently designed clutch system just like everybody else. But to say you would prefer a car without a clutch to a light clutch is just insanity to me. |
|
05-05-2009, 12:49 PM | #9 | |
Relic
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Bethesda, MD
Posts: 12,490
|
Quote:
That said, all the way in and all the way out are not actually correct. In order to launch correctly, you are swimming around in the middle, for example. Moreover, are you honestly telling me that you just let the lcuthc out when you decide you want to go forward? You don't modulate it?
__________________
2011 M3 2006 Sierra 2500HD 4WD LBZ/Allison 2004 X5 3.0i 6MT 1995 M3 S50B32 1990 325is 1989 M3 S54B32 Hers: 1989 325iX 1996 911 Turbo |
|
05-05-2009, 12:51 PM | #10 |
swinging for the fences
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: 987, X7 M60i, e36 M3
Location: Boston, MA
Posts: 5,046
|
FWIW, I didn't have too much trouble with the clutch in the e90 M3. It is certainly lighter than the one in my e36, but I was able to modulate it well enough. It's certainly not a deal killer. Not being able to find an '08 silver sedan, however, is an issue.
|
Bookmarks |
|
|