carmudgeons.com  

Go Back   carmudgeons.com > Automotive Forums > Car Talk

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 10-08-2004, 09:53 PM   #1
lemming
Western Anomaly
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,660
GM cars winning SCCA racing (stuka sucks....)

looks like the CTS-V and the corvettes prove that GM can do more than win at NASCAR.

http://www.autoweek.com/article.cms?articleId=100970

for the record, the next time someone asks me what i think a sports car is, it's the car that dominates the T1 class right now. and my idea of a GT that i would buy? the CTS-V. the car that seemed to hold its own in the T2 class with a lot of other "sports cars".

__________________


lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2004, 09:58 PM   #2
lemming
Western Anomaly
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,660
for the record: the T1 class winner? John Heinricy? The lead development engineer for the C5 and C6 dynamics.

you know. the one who ran the c5z06 on the nurburgring under 8 minutes.

just for "poseur" purposes. it wouldn't have anything to do with trying to meet a worldwide metric and then meeting/beating it.

__________________


lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2004, 12:18 AM   #3
clyde
Chief title editor
 
clyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 26,599
Re: GM cars winning SCCA racing.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lemming
looks like the CTS-V and the corvettes prove that GM can do more than win at NASCAR.
How can they possibly do that without a dry sump? :roll:
clyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2004, 11:58 AM   #4
blee
Doctor Mudgeon
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 6,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by clyde
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemming
looks like the CTS-V and the corvettes prove that GM can do more than win at NASCAR.
How can they possibly do that without a dry sump? :roll:
VANOS. Those GM race cars must have VANOS.
blee is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2004, 02:11 PM   #5
nate
Oh, are they?
 
nate's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: S4
Location: H-town
Posts: 10,281
But the Corvette is so "low tech." If only it had a 2.5L engine, then it would be worthy of praise.
__________________
"People keep saying I'm crazy as hell, but sooner or later they're going to realize I know what I'm talking about." - Charles Barkley
nate is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2004, 04:28 PM   #6
clyde
Chief title editor
 
clyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 26,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by blee
Quote:
Originally Posted by clyde
Quote:
Originally Posted by lemming
looks like the CTS-V and the corvettes prove that GM can do more than win at NASCAR.
How can they possibly do that without a dry sump? :roll:
VANOS. Those GM race cars must have VANOS.
Quadruple Bypass VANOS!
clyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2004, 11:22 AM   #7
lemming
Western Anomaly
 
lemming's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Carmudgeonly Ride: White Orca
Posts: 16,660
i also would like to recognize that BMWs do just fine at Speed World Challenge racing and in the grand am racing.

i think they would just do better if they took some arrogance and snobbery out of their approach and see how porsche excels. porsche engines are not about the most technological advances, they are about displacement and durability. technology, in porsche's corporate mindset, is secondary to power and endurance.
__________________


lemming is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Bookmarks


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 05:05 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums © 2003-2008, 'Mudgeon Enterprises - Site hosting by AYN & Associates, LLC