View Single Post
Old 04-08-2009, 06:05 PM   #8
clyde
Chief title editor
 
clyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 26,599
Quote:
Originally Posted by John V View Post
And fuel economy is very closely tied to engine RPM (and weight, and to a much smaller degree throttle position) so yes, the BMW gets worse mileage.
It may be splitting hairs and going in a different direction than you're talking about, but fuel economy is also tightly tied to throttle position. If you are traveling at a specific RPM with a constant throttle position, your fuel efficiency will be much better than if you rapidly alternated between wide open and closed throttle positions. If you jump on and off the throttle, obviously, the RPM won't be static, but if you do this over a set distance and turn the same number of revolutions and have the same average throttle position over that distance as the constant, you'll use a lot more fuel (how much depends on lots of variables).

How big or small the difference is relative the addition or subtraction of 500 pounds of load or 500 RPM...
__________________
OH NOES!!!!!1 MY CAR HAS T3H UND3R5T33R5555!!!!!!1oneone!!!!11

Team WTF?!
What are you gonna do?
clyde is offline   Reply With Quote