carmudgeons.com

carmudgeons.com (http://forums.carmudgeons.com/index.php)
-   Car Talk (http://forums.carmudgeons.com/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   let's have a poll: how much torque in the v8 M3? (http://forums.carmudgeons.com/showthread.php?t=7948)

lemming 09-07-2006 11:28 AM

let's have a poll: how much torque in the v8 M3?
 
i think we should also have a poll, since we have one for the curb weight, to guess how much torque the new car will have.

these things will be fun just to see how close we get to the actual production official figures.

i understand that if you did the math on the 5.0v10, you'd arrive at something like 305#ft --but recall that the F430 is also a benchmark at 343#ft displacing only 4.3 litres....

Plaz 09-07-2006 11:46 AM

322

iateyourcheese 09-07-2006 12:28 PM

This puzzles me... simple math says 305 lb-ft but that's so close to what the 335i can do. Oh well, 305 for me.

FC 09-07-2006 12:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iateyourcheese (Post 116598)
This puzzles me... simple math says 305 lb-ft but that's so close to what the 335i can do. Oh well, 305 for me.

I'll be nice, 310#'s.

Rob 09-07-2006 12:49 PM

Not enough. I expect the 320 area. Nowhere near enough.

blee 09-07-2006 01:24 PM

I expect a bit above 300, but that's about it. it's not going to be a torque monster.

...then again, since when did having 300 ft-lbs of torque become "not enough?" Corvettes were making about that much not ten years ago. My, how things have changed.

iateyourcheese 09-07-2006 02:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blee (Post 116615)
I expect a bit above 300, but that's about it. it's not going to be a torque monster.

...then again, since when did having 300 ft-lbs of torque become "not enough?" Corvettes were making about that much not ten years ago. My, how things have changed.

I'm going to guess that peak torque for the Corvette didn't occur at 6100 rpm.

lemming 09-07-2006 02:23 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by iateyourcheese (Post 116628)
I'm going to guess that peak torque for the Corvette didn't occur at 6100 rpm.


:lol:

be generous. it's going to be more like 5200rpms with "80%" available over a wide rpm range.

iateyourcheese 09-07-2006 02:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemming (Post 116632)
:lol:

be generous. it's going to be more like 5200rpms with "80%" available over a wide rpm range.

Torque curve doesn't look that flat to me http://www.rototestinstitute.org/spe...03-kW-Nm-C.png (M5 obviously tested here).

Or, you can buy a car with the opposite torque curve (335i) http://www.automobilemag.com/multime...dyno_chart.jpg

Rob 09-07-2006 03:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by blee (Post 116615)
...then again, since when did having 300 ft-lbs of torque become "not enough?"

I could always lend you my car for a month. Then you would agree that 300 ft-lbs is not enough for what this car is supposed to be, especially compared to what the competition is offering.

I think it will be interesting to see what the car is when it's all said and done. It has to beat the 335 in every performance aspect, after all.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 04:05 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums © 2003-2008, 'Mudgeon Enterprises - Site hosting by AYN & Associates, LLC