carmudgeons.com

carmudgeons.com (http://forums.carmudgeons.com/index.php)
-   Car Talk (http://forums.carmudgeons.com/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Z4 impressions... (http://forums.carmudgeons.com/showthread.php?t=140)

The HACK 10-15-2003 06:08 PM

Z4 impressions...
 
Where do I start?

There's this notion that the Z4 is just a much lighter version of the later E46 Cics are way wrong. The Z4 is NOTHING like the E46 dynamically. They may share a lot of suspension parts, but whatever BMW did to it, they must have put in different springs and shocks.

The blue Ci drives like it's on rails after all the modifications. The Z4, right out of the box, drives BETTER than the blue Ci. You push and push and it just keeps looking back at you like "is this all you got punk? I get a better work-out sitting in the garage." The limit on this car is the TIRES. They are heavy and they don't grip all that well. I've gotten them to squeal like a pig easily, and they tend to transmit way too much vibration into the car.

I remember how noisy my Z3 was now. The Z4, despite better insulation, is noisy as hell with the top up or down. In a way I've gotten spoiled by the Ci. It is so quiet I can't hear the Remus exhaust when the windows are all closed. The Z4 on the other hand is all about visceral grunt and sheer pen*s extension, much like the Z3 was if it had a bigger engine.

Balance on this car is like all other BMW, neutral with a touch of understeer. Steering is the biggest surprised. I hear all this complaints about the electronic assisted steering. The Z4 steering is actually heavier and more precise than my Ci's steering, and it's got the old, good steering wearing fat sticky boots up front (235s). And its smooth as butter, but sharp as a knife going through corners. No dead spot. Returns to center quickly and easily. It IS a touch light when manuevering in the parking lot, but not enough to throw me off.

Now to the bad part. Ergonomics SUCKS in this car. The window buttons are hard to reach. The DSC button and the top up/down buttons are hard to reach. The seat adjustiment buttons are hard to reach. The small door pouches are hard to reach. The Z3 was much better in this regard. The material used in the Z4 is also a big step back...Although the extended leather part of it is very, very nice.

Not much new on this car that I haven't expected though.

SpaceMonk 10-15-2003 06:27 PM

Sounds about right. There's a regular Z4 in our autocrosses, and that car does unbelievably well. There were no classifications for it, so it was dropped in the same class as 325's and 330's. It'll be reclassed higher for next year. I'd love to drive one.

Speaking of bad ergonomics, he always bangs his left knee and thigh on the door pouches. Have you noticed this yet? Or maybe it's just when you're trashing the car around.

Mathew 10-15-2003 06:28 PM

Ergonomics do suck. I remember reaching WAY below my knees to get to the window switches.

The HACK 10-15-2003 06:32 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by SpaceMonk
Sounds about right. There's a regular Z4 in our autocrosses, and that car does unbelievably well. There were no classifications for it, so it was dropped in the same class as 325's and 330's. It'll be reclassed higher for next year. I'd love to drive one.

Speaking of bad ergonomics, he always bangs his left knee and thigh on the door pouches. Have you noticed this yet? Or maybe it's just when you're trashing the car around.

Same here. My left knee will probably develope some bruising if I keep driving it.

You guys will have no shot at beating the Z4 with 325s and 330s. With a good set of tires, the Z4 3.0 will be COMPETITIVE against the likes of E46 M3s. In fact, I think it'll spank E46 M3s alive on the autocross course. The only thing that should keep up with it are the S52 M roadys and coupes, and the S54 M roadys/coupes should beat it.

dredmo 10-15-2003 06:36 PM

Ergonomics is the reason my wife decided that I could get a coupe instead of a Z. It was tough for my wife, who was too small, and tough for me, I was too big.

Unfortunately/fortunately a Z is our loaner car at the dealer.

But it has so much else going for it, I still love the looks of it.

The HACK 10-15-2003 07:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by dredmo
Ergonomics is the reason my wife decided that I could get a coupe instead of a Z. It was tough for my wife, who was too small, and tough for me, I was too big.

Unfortunately/fortunately a Z is our loaner car at the dealer.

But it has so much else going for it, I still love the looks of it.

We have no such problem. I'm about 5'11 1/2" and she's well over 5'6", so the car actually fit us both quite well. I have seat memory setting 3 while she took 1, and I set 2 to the default, as far back as possible to make it easier to get in and out of the car.

And I exaggerated a bit when I say my knee will be bruised...It bumps and rubs up against the handle but it will only be a problem if I keep my foot on the deadrest.

dredmo 10-15-2003 07:18 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The HACK
Quote:

Originally Posted by dredmo
Ergonomics is the reason my wife decided that I could get a coupe instead of a Z. It was tough for my wife, who was too small, and tough for me, I was too big.

Unfortunately/fortunately a Z is our loaner car at the dealer.

But it has so much else going for it, I still love the looks of it.

We have no such problem. I'm about 5'11 1/2" and she's well over 5'6", so the car actually fit us both quite well. I have seat memory setting 3 while she took 1, and I set 2 to the default, as far back as possible to make it easier to get in and out of the car.

And I exaggerated a bit when I say my knee will be bruised...It bumps and rubs up against the handle but it will only be a problem if I keep my foot on the deadrest.


Awesome, sounds like a perfect fit. :smile:

scottn2retro 10-16-2003 04:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by The HACK
You guys will have no shot at beating the Z4 with 325s and 330s. With a good set of tires, the Z4 3.0 will be COMPETITIVE against the likes of E46 M3s. In fact, I think it'll spank E46 M3s alive on the autocross course. The only thing that should keep up with it are the S52 M roadys and coupes, and the S54 M roadys/coupes should beat it.

Glad to know the MRoady will still be good for something. :smile:

Other than that, the Z4 is supposed to correct the things people b*tched about the Z3 all the time (although ergonomics apparently wasn't on the list). You've addressed the improved handling. And it sounds like there's more room in the cockpit. How does the trunk size compare? The glass back window is an obvious improvement. And the car has run-flats, right, so no funky M mobility kit?

lemming 10-16-2003 04:50 PM

i did test a z4 3.0 6spd and i really liked the way that it drove.

having owned an e36/8, i really appreciated a lot of the upgrades, mostly in the suspension dept.

it handles quite well. there was an aspect that i probably need to drive the car again to explain well. there were one too many layers between me and the road?

take home: dynamically, it IS a fine car, man.

honestly, if it were not for the looks, i'd consider one. but i just cannot warm to that car enough to want to own one for myself.

The HACK 10-16-2003 06:35 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pDz
it handles quite well. there was an aspect that i probably need to drive the car again to explain well. there were one too many layers between me and the road?.

It's probably the electronic steering assist (it's not a steering pump with hydraulic fluid anymore). The steering is as precise as ever but the boost felt "artificial".

Didn't bother me.

Roadstergal 10-16-2003 06:40 PM

Re: Z4 impressions...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The HACK
I've gotten them to squeal like a pig easily

Do they have a real purty mouth?

Re: the Bahstan classifications - SCCA has them classed in stock B, with the S2000s - isn't that where the 330s are?

SpaceMonk 10-16-2003 07:12 PM

Re: Z4 impressions...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The HACK
Where do I start?

There's this notion that the Z4 is just a much lighter version of the later E46 Cics are way wrong. The Z4 is NOTHING like the E46 dynamically. They may share a lot of suspension parts, but whatever BMW did to it, they must have put in different springs and shocks.

The blue Ci drives like it's on rails after all the modifications. The Z4, right out of the box, drives BETTER than the blue Ci. You push and push and it just keeps looking back at you like "is this all you got punk? I get a better work-out sitting in the garage." The limit on this car is the TIRES. They are heavy and they don't grip all that well. I've gotten them to squeal like a pig easily, and they tend to transmit way too much vibration into the car.

I remember how noisy my Z3 was now. The Z4, despite better insulation, is noisy as hell with the top up or down. In a way I've gotten spoiled by the Ci. It is so quiet I can't hear the Remus exhaust when the windows are all closed. The Z4 on the other hand is all about visceral grunt and sheer pen*s extension, much like the Z3 was if it had a bigger engine.

Balance on this car is like all other BMW, neutral with a touch of understeer. Steering is the biggest surprised. I hear all this complaints about the electronic assisted steering. The Z4 steering is actually heavier and more precise than my Ci's steering, and it's got the old, good steering wearing fat sticky boots up front (235s). And its smooth as butter, but sharp as a knife going through corners. No dead spot. Returns to center quickly and easily. It IS a touch light when manuevering in the parking lot, but not enough to throw me off.

Now to the bad part. Ergonomics SUCKS in this car. The window buttons are hard to reach. The DSC button and the top up/down buttons are hard to reach. The seat adjustiment buttons are hard to reach. The small door pouches are hard to reach. The Z3 was much better in this regard. The material used in the Z4 is also a big step back...Although the extended leather part of it is very, very nice.

Not much new on this car that I haven't expected though.

Can I go over to the other board now and say :repost: ?

;) :stickpoke:

The HACK 10-16-2003 07:32 PM

Re: Z4 impressions...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by SpaceMonk
Can I go over to the other board now and say :repost: ?

;) :stickpoke:

Feel free, but make sure you post a link back to this thread to PROOVE that it was indeed a cross post/repost. :lol:

SpaceMonk 10-16-2003 07:48 PM

Re: Z4 impressions...
 
Quote:

Originally Posted by The HACK
Quote:

Originally Posted by SpaceMonk
Can I go over to the other board now and say :repost: ?

;) :stickpoke:

Feel free, but make sure you post a link back to this thread to PROOVE that it was indeed a cross post/repost. :lol:

LOL. Heh. It would be even funnier if this was in The Pub, so the link wouldn't work for non-registered members. :lol:

GSR13 10-17-2003 01:01 AM

I have driven two Z4's, a 2.5 Manual and a 3.0 Step. Both cars drove extremely well and the handling was excellent. The 3.0, despite being a Step, was felt tons faster than my 330i. Granted, most of it was perception, but the car just feels like a rocket.

I agree about the Roof Switch and the Window Switches, both were placed poorly in my opinion. I could deal with it, since it is not something that I am constantly dealing with. I just get used to having them by the shifter. I also dislike the straight dash. I prefer the old school style with the radio and cliimate control tilted towards the driver. Not a big adjustment, as the Z3 is the basically the same way.

The one thing I really like is the position/feel of the shifter. Both the Manual and the Step Shifter feel very well positioned in relation to the driver. I also love the top. Not having to release the latches is a major plus, as is the glass rear window. BMW definately fixed a lot of complaints that we have had with the Z3, but overall my wife disklikes the Z4.

She dislikes the styling but was also very unimpressed with her time spent driving the car. While it immediately turned her off to the Z4, I feel most of her problem was seat position. She is only 5' 3" and the seat was lowered all the way down, which made her feel very low inside the car. This is not a feeling that ever happens in the Z3. The doors just seem much taller on the Z4.

I definately like the car and would seriously consider one if I were buying a roadster for a third car. Not sure it would top the list, but it would definately be on it.

The HACK 10-17-2003 12:29 PM

GSR, regarding the seating position...

I've noticed that the Z4 dash is SIGNIFICANTLY higher than the Z3, and the windshield, while raked, has a much smaller area to view through than the Z3 and my E46. Creates an illusion of clastrophobia, especially with the top up.

My wife made the same complaint about not being able to see clearly through the high dash, but then once she found the right seating position she was all cool about buying this car.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums © 2003-2008, 'Mudgeon Enterprises - Site hosting by AYN & Associates, LLC