carmudgeons.com

carmudgeons.com (http://forums.carmudgeons.com/index.php)
-   Car Talk (http://forums.carmudgeons.com/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   718 GTS vs. 911 T (http://forums.carmudgeons.com/showthread.php?t=149474)

wdc330i 05-23-2018 11:24 AM

718 GTS vs. 911 T
 
So this discussion doesn't get buried in the Autoblog trash heap.

http://forums.carmudgeons.com/showthread.php?t=149461

Jeff_DML 05-23-2018 01:49 PM

I would take the 911T since i still have use for the rear seats and prefer the sound of the 6 even though the Cayman is probably dynamically superior.

Edit: now after I wrote above I actually way prefer the T, if I had the money I might get but new Cayman has no interest to me. Actually I would prefer a used cayman with the 6 over a new one. Guess if you offered me a free new one or a used one I would probably take a new one:D

John V 05-23-2018 02:16 PM

Cayman. Not even remotely close.

rumatt 05-23-2018 02:26 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdc330i (Post 530397)
So this discussion doesn't get buried in the Autoblog trash heap.

Yes!

I don't suppose there's a way to automatically promote spambot threads once someone has started a conversation, eh?

Clyde is always looking for something to do, right?

rumatt 05-23-2018 02:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff_DML (Post 530411)
Edit: now after I wrote above I actually way prefer the T, if I had the money I might get but new Cayman has no interest to me. Actually I would prefer a used cayman with the 6 over a new one. Guess if you offered me a free new one or a used one I would probably take a new one:D

I'm really looking forward to test driving the 718 next week. While there are a lot of haters, there's a small group of folks who really like it.

This dealer has one Cayman they use as a loner. I couldn't use it this time because it's book the month out, but I might make an appointment for a squeak / rattle just as an excuse to bring the Cayman home for a day.

Josh (PA) 05-23-2018 06:16 PM

I've been window shopping 981 GTS boxsters over the last month or so. Seems like they are on the 'fair' end of the Porsche price fantasy.

rumatt 05-23-2018 08:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josh (PA) (Post 530440)
I've been window shopping 981 GTS boxsters over the last month or so. Seems like they are on the 'fair' end of the Porsche price fantasy.

The ones I saw on autotrader were still crack pipe pricing.

Jeff_DML 06-06-2018 11:18 AM

Another one but different vote

http://autoweek.com/article/car-revi...n=awdailydrive

John V 06-06-2018 12:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff_DML (Post 531247)

I haven't driven the 718, but based on what I'm hearing from co-workers that have driven them, the engine ruins the car. Fast, but the power delivery really hurts the balance and fluidity that the Boxster/Cayman used to have.

wdc330i 06-06-2018 02:24 PM

For Rumatt: (the racing buckets were very uncomfortable, with no recline function -- don’t order them).

Referring to the 911T.

Edit: A $20k delta between the two is pretty significant.

Jeff_DML 06-06-2018 02:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdc330i (Post 531265)
For Rumatt: (the racing buckets were very uncomfortable, with no recline function -- don’t order them).

Referring to the 911T.

Edit: A $20k delta between the two is pretty significant.

yeah the delta is large but if I was paying $80k for a 718 then it seem not so much to me. Basically a more base level priced 918 seems the way to go for a 918 to me.

Alan 06-06-2018 04:01 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdc330i (Post 531265)
For Rumatt: (the racing buckets were very uncomfortable, with no recline function -- don’t order them).

Referring to the 911T.

Edit: A $20k delta between the two is pretty significant.

That's funny I was thinking the opposite plus on resale you'll get back a decent chunk of it.

rumatt 06-07-2018 06:35 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdc330i (Post 531265)
For Rumatt: (the racing buckets were very uncomfortable, with no recline function -- don’t order them).

:lol:

lemming 06-08-2018 06:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Jeff_DML (Post 531247)



Nice.

That stimulates thought.

lemming 06-25-2018 12:45 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemming (Post 531363)
Nice.

That stimulates thought.



Okay. Someone whose car advice I prioritize above all others (my P mechanic) says the 718 Boxster S is probably the best car Porsche builds today.

The engine is proven and it handles the best.

10 out of 10 times he’d recommend to sell my car and to get one of those.

😳

wdc330i 06-25-2018 02:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemming (Post 532285)
Okay. Someone whose car advice I prioritize above all others (my P mechanic) says the 718 Boxster S is probably the best car Porsche builds today.

The engine is proven and it handles the best.

10 out of 10 times he’d recommend to sell my car and to get one of those.

😳

:):D

lemming 06-25-2018 05:07 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdc330i (Post 532290)
:):D



So. Now curiosity is killing me.

I have to drive 718 and 718 S models.

wdc330i 06-25-2018 05:39 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemming (Post 532299)
So. Now curiosity is killing me.

I have to drive 718 and 718 S models.

The first is not as fun as the second...

lemming 06-27-2018 02:13 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdc330i (Post 532305)
The first is not as fun as the second...



On a scale of 1-10, how does each car rate?

wdc330i 06-27-2018 02:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemming (Post 532415)
On a scale of 1-10, how does each car rate?

It's been a year since I drove the non-S. Hmm. 6 to 8-9? Both were PDK, so that probably makes a big difference. I doubt I'd get the PDK in the non-S, but it feels just right in the S.

The Boxster is such a different style and feel from my dd, the M240. My car feels fast, light, and tossable, just all around fun and easy. The Boxster feels very Germanic--solid, precise, and powerful, almost menacing. Edit: I should mention that our 718s has the Sport Chrono option, GT steering wheel (with sport button on it) and power steering plus.

Here's a relevant thread, with some interesting bits: https://www.718forum.com/forum/2017-...-chrono-3.html

"From the Porsche website:
"The 718 Boxster S and 718 Cayman S come equipped with variable turbine geometry (VTG). Adjustable guide vanes on the turbine act to combine the benefits of a ‘small’ and a ‘large’ exhaust turbocharger. Derived from the proven 911 Turbo and adapted specifically for the 718 S models, this technology helps to deliver excellent responsiveness at low engine speeds and provide a high maximum power output."

And:
"The S performance is the way to go. These metrics are from Car and Driver instrumentation-based testing:

C/D TEST RESULTS FOR 718 CAYMAN S PDK
Zero to 60 mph: 3.6 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 8.7 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 15.2 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 22.8 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 4.4 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.5 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 2.9 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.0 sec @ 117 mph
Top speed (mfr's claim): 177 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 142 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 1.02 g

C/D TEST RESULTS FOR 718 CAYMAN PDK:

Zero to 60 mph: 3.9 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.6 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 17.5 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 27.6 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 5.1 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.9 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 3.1 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.4 sec @ 113 mph
Top speed (drag limited, mfr's claim): 171 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 146 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 1.00 g

C/D TEST RESULTS 718 CAYMAN MANUAL:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.3 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 10.5 sec
Zero to 120 mph: 15.5 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 27.8 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 6.1 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 10.2 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 6.5 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.8 sec @ 109 mph
Top speed (mfr's claim): 171 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 141 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 1.03 g"

And this from a Car and Driver write up:
VTG, another donation from the 911 Turbo (and notably absent in the new 911), imbues the Boxster S with sharper-seeming responses than the regular Boxster. The 2.5’s larger turbo runs up to 14.5 psi of boost, giving the 350-hp Boxster S a substantial 50 horsepower and 29 lb-ft torque advantage over the 2.0-liter car, whose smaller turbo nonetheless offers up to 20.3 psi of pressure. Both engines produce peak torque below 2000 rpm—280 lb-ft at 1950 rpm for the 2.0-liter and 309 at 1900 for the 2.5, and in each case the full twist is available through 4500 rpm before gently tapering off. Peak horsepower arrives at 6500 rpm for both engines, which rev to 7500 rpm.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...st-ride-review

lemming 06-27-2018 09:52 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by wdc330i (Post 532416)
It's been a year since I drove the non-S. Hmm. 6 to 8-9? Both were PDK, so that probably makes a big difference. I doubt I'd get the PDK in the non-S, but it feels just right in the S.

The Boxster is such a different style and feel from my dd, the M240. My car feels fast, light, and tossable, just all around fun and easy. The Boxster feels very Germanic--solid, precise, and powerful, almost menacing. Edit: I should mention that our 718s has the Sport Chrono option, GT steering wheel (with sport button on it) and power steering plus.

Here's a relevant thread, with some interesting bits: https://www.718forum.com/forum/2017-...-chrono-3.html

"From the Porsche website:
"The 718 Boxster S and 718 Cayman S come equipped with variable turbine geometry (VTG). Adjustable guide vanes on the turbine act to combine the benefits of a ‘small’ and a ‘large’ exhaust turbocharger. Derived from the proven 911 Turbo and adapted specifically for the 718 S models, this technology helps to deliver excellent responsiveness at low engine speeds and provide a high maximum power output."

And:
"The S performance is the way to go. These metrics are from Car and Driver instrumentation-based testing:

C/D TEST RESULTS FOR 718 CAYMAN S PDK
Zero to 60 mph: 3.6 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 8.7 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 15.2 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 22.8 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 4.4 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.5 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 2.9 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.0 sec @ 117 mph
Top speed (mfr's claim): 177 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 142 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 1.02 g

C/D TEST RESULTS FOR 718 CAYMAN PDK:

Zero to 60 mph: 3.9 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 9.6 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 17.5 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 27.6 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 5.1 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 2.9 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 3.1 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.4 sec @ 113 mph
Top speed (drag limited, mfr's claim): 171 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 146 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 1.00 g

C/D TEST RESULTS 718 CAYMAN MANUAL:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.3 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 10.5 sec
Zero to 120 mph: 15.5 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 27.8 sec
Rolling start, 5-60 mph: 6.1 sec
Top gear, 30-50 mph: 10.2 sec
Top gear, 50-70 mph: 6.5 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.8 sec @ 109 mph
Top speed (mfr's claim): 171 mph
Braking, 70-0 mph: 141 ft
Roadholding, 300-ft-dia skidpad: 1.03 g"

And this from a Car and Driver write up:
VTG, another donation from the 911 Turbo (and notably absent in the new 911), imbues the Boxster S with sharper-seeming responses than the regular Boxster. The 2.5’s larger turbo runs up to 14.5 psi of boost, giving the 350-hp Boxster S a substantial 50 horsepower and 29 lb-ft torque advantage over the 2.0-liter car, whose smaller turbo nonetheless offers up to 20.3 psi of pressure. Both engines produce peak torque below 2000 rpm—280 lb-ft at 1950 rpm for the 2.0-liter and 309 at 1900 for the 2.5, and in each case the full twist is available through 4500 rpm before gently tapering off. Peak horsepower arrives at 6500 rpm for both engines, which rev to 7500 rpm.
https://www.caranddriver.com/reviews...st-ride-review



While my guru swears the new engines here are battle tested, it’s the one thing that makes me nervous. Porsche has never done a first gen engine well.

Other than that these cars are blazingly fast, from the looks of it.

wdc330i 06-27-2018 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemming (Post 532439)
While my guru swears the new engines here are battle tested, it’s the one thing that makes me nervous. Porsche has never done a first gen engine well.

Other than that these cars are blazingly fast, from the looks of it.

I have a new B58, so everything could blow up on us, I guess.

rumatt 06-27-2018 11:37 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemming (Post 532285)
The engine is proven and it handles the best.

It's proven? What's the history of this engine?

Jeff_DML 06-27-2018 11:46 PM

Seems like the s is under stressed with the bigger displacement and vv turbo.

Edit: tune does not look as impressive as I expected. Maybe vv turbo is the issue.

http://www.cobbtuning.com/wp/app/upl...5_16-32-20.png

ff 06-28-2018 07:19 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by lemming (Post 532439)
Other than that these cars are blazingly fast, from the looks of it.

No kidding. :eek:

JST 06-28-2018 07:28 AM

Jesus, the base models are running 12s in the 1/4?

lemming 06-28-2018 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JST (Post 532447)
Jesus, the base models are running 12s in the 1/4?



Right?

That’s basically super car territory until 5 years ago.


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 12:16 PM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums © 2003-2008, 'Mudgeon Enterprises - Site hosting by AYN & Associates, LLC