1998 M Roadster near me
|
Am I wrong or is that as really good price for that car ... that thing must be a lot of fun to drive.
|
Quote:
|
That is still a good price for the miles. Super fun little car. I just hear they fall apart right and left from the crappy build quality.
|
Clown shoe.
Next. |
Hmmmm.... maybe my Dad didn't give me as good a deal as I thought. It does seem like that one is well priced.
We paid $8k for the one we got a couple weeks ago, 47k miles. So far, Cari really enjoys it. |
Quote:
I guess they bring a fresh perspective if they haven't owned bmws for the last two decades like we have? |
Quote:
People like the MZ3, especially the S54, because it’s a really fun car to be in. It’s communicative. Also, unlike the 1M, it was fast in its day. (The 1M is a great driver’s car, but the objective performance wasn’t very good.) |
Quote:
While I said "parts bin", that's not necessarily derogatory if they wrapped those parts in a body designed by a proper shop, as the 1M was. And, now that we are comparing tastes, I happen to like the e82. The z3 coupe in comparison seems to have been designed by an unhappy child told to put a roof on the z3 roadster (which itself was quite acceptable). |
Quote:
I also regard the E30 rear suspension as a net-positive. It’s part of what makes them so interesting to drive. And given that on 1998 tires, and with the S50B32 (which is meaningfully slower than the S54, as much as I like it), the Z3M was only 8 seconds slower around the Nurburgring, you could make a plausible argument that the 1M actually handles *worse* with its parts bin E9x M3 suspension. |
All times are GMT -4. The time now is 01:14 PM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums © 2003-2008, 'Mudgeon Enterprises - Site hosting by AYN & Associates, LLC