carmudgeons.com

carmudgeons.com (http://forums.carmudgeons.com/index.php)
-   Car Talk (http://forums.carmudgeons.com/forumdisplay.php?f=11)
-   -   Now I know why they named by sister's BMW "E92" (http://forums.carmudgeons.com/showthread.php?t=139825)

equ 09-27-2017 12:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 3LOU5 (Post 512763)
Because it's twice as good as my E46, lol.

Got a chance to spend some seat time in my sister's E92 coupe. All I can say is "WOW". I LOVE the clutch feel, the buttery-smooth and short (compared to my car anyways) shifts of the 6-speed manual and tight/heavy steering.

It just feels more solid than my car........is it because it is slightly newer and has 50k less miles than mine ?? Perhaps.

"Welcome to 2007".

:lol:

Great post. I've owned several e46's (along with the current M) and several e90's.

The e46 clutch (at least the 330i's that I was used to), were springy, long travel with high engagement. The e90 had better clutches. The shifters are smoother & more precise as well (again for the non-M).

Also, you are spot on in terms of solidity. The e9X is a much more solid car, what you are feeling is not only due to the lesser miles.

Negatives for the e9x:
- Interior design. Worse cupholders, flat Buick dash (before Buicks were Opels)
- Exterior. Not as bad as the interior, but not as classic/faultless as the e46
- Runflats and no room for a donut
- M became v8 (an awesome one but dropped hwy range dramatically)

rumatt 09-27-2017 02:33 PM

I never noticed any negative of the E46 clutch other than the absurdly long travel. But I immediately installed a clutch stop in both the E46 and E91 so that's a non-issue.

I do agree the shifter is better in the E9x.

The rest I can't really compare because it's a 330i coupe vs a 325xi wagon.

The lack of a spare tire pisses me off to no end. There's always a spare tire back there clogging up the space. Ridiculous.

equ 09-27-2017 04:31 PM

True, its not like the e46 clutch was cheap, it wasnt. Really the two most major differences are 1. body solidity (huge, I always feel the e46 tweak on angles/driveways 2. N52/N54 instead of m52/m54 engines. Less NVH.

Sent from my SM-G935V using Tapatalk

JST 09-27-2017 05:46 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by equ (Post 512850)
Great post. I've owned several e46's (along with the current M) and several e90's.

The e46 clutch (at least the 330i's that I was used to), were springy, long travel with high engagement. The e90 had better clutches. The shifters are smoother & more precise as well (again for the non-M).

Also, you are spot on in terms of solidity. The e9X is a much more solid car, what you are feeling is not only due to the lesser miles.

Negatives for the e9x:
- Interior design. Worse cupholders, flat Buick dash (before Buicks were Opels)
- Exterior. Not as bad as the interior, but not as classic/faultless as the e46
- Runflats and no room for a donut
- M became v8 (an awesome one but dropped hwy range dramatically)

I remember going from a ZHP 330i to the 335i back in the day. The extra power from the twin turbo engine was AMAZING, and yeah, the 335 felt more solid.

In every other respect the 330 was more fun to drive. I miss the ZHP. I don't miss the 335 at all.

Josh (PA) 09-27-2017 06:09 PM

Personally, I vastly preferred the clutch and shifter feel of the e8x and e9x cars to the e46 manuals. I find the steering more lively on my e46. The e9x x drive suspension had a huge flaw with the way it handles impacts like potholes

rumatt 09-27-2017 11:20 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Josh (PA) (Post 512893)
Personally, I vastly preferred the clutch and shifter feel of the e8x and e9x cars to the e46 manuals.

Were early E46 clutches shitty or something? Or do I just not know what a shitty clutch feels like... and I need to educate myself ASAP so I can start hating my car?

Josh (PA) 09-28-2017 09:49 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rumatt (Post 512905)
Were early E46 clutches shitty or something? Or do I just not know what a shitty clutch feels like... and I need to educate myself ASAP so I can start hating my car?

Not sure, I had an '00 328 and an '01 325. I also spent some time in a later ZHP prior to buying my m5. I agree with equ's comment about them feeling springy. The pedal load would change quite a lot as it traveled. I find the e8x and e9x clutches much more linear. I also felt like the engagement point would move in the e46, and/or that the engagement point was right where you'd overcome the springy load point making it hard to modulate.

If I were you, I wouldn't go around looking for things not to like on your 330... after all the work JV did, hopefully you can just hop in and enjoy it for a while. I love our e46 wagon, x suspension, auto tranny and all. It is the car we talk most about keeping forever.

rumatt 09-28-2017 10:15 AM

Oh yeah, I was just kidding. I won't be getting rid of the car any time soon.

Anyone who doesn't like their E46 clutch should try a clutch stop and adjust it nice and high. I'm pretty sure everything I've seen described goes away.

bren 09-28-2017 10:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by rumatt (Post 512922)
Oh yeah, I was just kidding. I won't be getting rid of the car any time soon.

Anyone who doesn't like their E46 clutch should try a clutch stop and adjust it nice and high. I'm pretty sure everything I've seen described goes away.

You know what else fixes the crummy e46 clutch/shifter - SMG. :p

rumatt 09-28-2017 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by bren (Post 512929)
You know what else fixes the crummy e46 clutch/shifter

A crummier clutch/shifter? :lol:


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 08:36 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.1
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Forums © 2003-2008, 'Mudgeon Enterprises - Site hosting by AYN & Associates, LLC