View Full Version : M Roadster article
Not super informative, but worth the 2 minutes it takes to read:
http://www.nytimes.com/2006/01/09/automobiles/autospecial/bmwz4.html?ex=1139461200&en=5792580cf6484c6a&ei=5070
The M front and rear lower fascia’s go a long way in helping the appearance of the car. I still HATE the clown nose and Z door slash but I kind of realllllllly want one. I will at least test drive it.
MMMM Imola!!
lemming
02-07-2006, 08:54 PM
The M front and rear lower fascia’s go a long way in helping the appearance of the car. I still HATE the clown nose and Z door slash but I kind of realllllllly want one. I will at least test drive it.
MMMM Imola!!
still like the M coupe better, personally.
still like the M coupe better, personally.
Let me tell you... That roadster in Imola red looks pretty bad-ass. I actually like the dark interior with the fat wheel and M3 seats. My wife doesn't dislike the exterior.
BUT:
-No Euro delivery
-Time-bomb engine
-Not a pretty car
It will be tough to get over these issues. We'll see. I still prefer 987S/987CS, save for the lack of LSD.
undefined
02-07-2006, 09:17 PM
time-bomb engine?
what are you talking about?
IndyMike
02-07-2006, 09:44 PM
http://www.spookshows.com/toys/time/timebomb.gif
I haven't heard of any rod bearing issues in a long while, VANOS issues however :speechle:
http://www.spookshows.com/toys/time/timebomb.gif
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
IndyMike
02-08-2006, 09:55 PM
:lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:
It looks about as exciting as playing twister with nothing but guys (not that there's anything wrong with that).
http://www.spookshows.com/toys/time/tbomb.gif
Oh, and I also am still wondering about the time bomb reference to the engines. :dunno:
vBulletin® v3.7.1, Copyright ©2000-2012, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.