e65 mark II: the way it should have been originally.

[lemming]

http://www.germancarfans.com/news.cfm/newsid/2050127.007/bmw/1.html

the rear is much better and the front, while it looks more like a volvo s80, is much, much better.

[JST]

http://www.germancarfans.com/news.cfm/newsid/2050127.007/bmw/1.html

the rear is much better and the front, while it looks more like a volvo s80, is much, much better.

Yes, the outside is now essentially inoffensive, though I still think it looks too slab-sided for its own good.

The interior is still pretty nasty.

[bren]

I always wondered why the tail lights didn't continue onto the trunk lid.

[FC]

http://www.germancarfans.com/news.cfm/newsid/2050127.007/bmw/1.html

the rear is much better and the front, while it looks more like a volvo s80, is much, much better.

Yes, the outside is now essentially inoffensive, though I still think it looks too slab-sided for its own good.

The interior is still pretty nasty.

I agree. The trunk is still a big butt, but certainly doesn't require pepto bismol after looing at it anymore.

[ff]

Still not pretty, but waaaay better than version 1.

[blee]

Much better. The new powertrain packages also look to be exciting. The interior, as stated already, still looks uninviting and less intimate than its predecessor's. All of the new BMWs have this problem, sadly.

[SCA]

Sorry, but it still looks like shit. :roll:

[killerdeck]

Sorry, but it still looks like shit. :roll:

Ditto here too! :?

[Plaz]

I like it.

The interior still sucks though.