PDA

View Full Version : Toyota developing cheap RWD coupe?


ff
07-06-2007, 12:52 PM
Nice! (as long as it doesn't come standard with a slushie and Toyo-soft suspension). Honda, are you paying attention??

http://www.autoblog.com/2007/07/06/welcome-back-to-the-rumormill-toyota-developing-cheap-rwd-coupe/

Back in March, Winding Road floated the idea that Toyota may be in the process of developing a rear-wheel drive vehicle in the same vein as the Corolla AE86 of the 80s. At the time, it was easy to pass it off as pure speculation. Now, the GTChannel says that its sources in the Land of the Rising Sun have also confirmed that a 2+2, front-engine, RWD vehicle is in the works and that if and when it comes to market its sticker will be "well under [$] 20k" – maybe even $16,000.

Considering that the Scion brand has quickly emerged as a cost-conscious means of stylish transport, it wouldn't be hard to imagine that such a vehicle would slot in nicely within the youth-oriented marque, even if its price would make it a direct competitor to the tC. The only rub is finding a suitable platform to build the new vehicle atop, and the only RWD vehicle that could fit the bill would be the Lexus IS. Granted, the $30,000+ sports sedan's underpinnings might be a bit of a stretch (or shortening, in this case) to make a budget performance car, but the ability to cut costs via platform sharing isn't out of the question. Maybe some of the old IS's architecture could even be used.

In the meantime, we're hoping to see spy shots of a tC-bodied mule making the rounds around the 'Ring, rear-wheels a blazing and powersliding into the Carousel.

[Source: GTChannel]

Nick M3
07-06-2007, 01:07 PM
Wouldn't really matter. Insurance costs for a car like that would make a 3'er cheaper.

I was paying $1600/year for the M3 - not bad for a <25 single male. I got a quote for an '06 WRX, and it came out to more than I was paying for the M3 and the 323i combined. I'd bet a car like this would be similar, if not worse.

blee
07-06-2007, 01:15 PM
dooooriftoooo

blee
07-06-2007, 01:16 PM
Wouldn't really matter. Insurance costs for a car like that would make a 3'er cheaper.

I was paying $1600/year for the M3 - not bad for a <25 single male. I got a quote for an '06 WRX, and it came out to more than I was paying for the M3 and the 323i combined. I'd bet a car like this would be similar, if not worse.
Don't forget that you're living in a very expensive part of town. That said -- this is when it pays to be an old fart. :p

Rob
07-06-2007, 02:48 PM
Not necessarily. it might only have 100 hp. That will make it pretty cheap to insure.

lupinsea
07-06-2007, 07:59 PM
this is when it pays to be an old fart. :p
Nah. . . just means you're closer to death by old age. :dunno: :D

Theo
07-06-2007, 10:34 PM
Don't forget that you're living in a very expensive part of town. That said -- this is when it pays to be an old fart. :p


Like your old! please

blee
07-06-2007, 11:57 PM
Like your old! please
It's all relative. ;) Once the school year starts up, I'll be spending 8+ hrs/day with people who were born around 1985.

clyde
07-07-2007, 12:21 AM
Not necessarily. it might only have 100 hp. That will make it pretty cheap to insure.
which is actually one of the reasons that the 240SX and Miata had such little power

lupinsea
07-07-2007, 02:49 AM
Yup. Mazda didn't want thier little roadster hit with high insurance rates that would surely have come with more power.